answers: 29

  1. Arkady Shapoval
    13.08.2012

    Actually, I wrote about this.

    Reply

  2. Ivan
    13.08.2012

    Therefore, Mikar / s 4,5 / 55 can be used on full-frame cameras without any vignetting.
    In the whole speech Amar 4,5 / 105

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      13.08.2012

      Thanks, fixed. Doing two reviews in parallel - you can get confused.

      Reply

  3. M. Ilyich
    13.08.2012

    Can be used in wartime as a last resort

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      13.08.2012

      It would be better if such a case did not occur for the photographer :)

      Reply

  4. MELHAUZ
    13.08.2012

    It looks awful on the camera :(

    Reply

  5. Misha
    30.08.2012

    Time to try on lenses from overhead projectors and (what is already there) - magnifiers ;-))

    As always, it is very informative, thanks for your work!

    Reply

  6. Ivan Avestian
    04.01.2013

    I have an older version of such a lens, without a “convenient hood”) AMAR PZO f = 10,5cm 1: 4,5 More beautiful on the carcass)
    All lenses are non-blacked. A very sharp telephoto for 50 rubles) Used with Chinese macro rings for $ 8 on a Canon crop camera. (Carcass + canon ef macro rings (16 + 30mm) + adapter EF-m42)

    Reply

  7. nukemall
    06.02.2013

    1. This is not a telephoto lens. This is a normal stock medium format lens. “Normal” means that it covers the frame with a diagonal close to the focal length. "Native" - ​​originally intended for shooting (and printing) a frame, the diagonal of which is close to the focal length. These are close concepts, but not identical. A normal lens remains that way, even if (as in this case) it is shot with a camera with a frame size smaller than the one for which it will be standard. A telephoto lens is just an “abnormal” lens - it covers less than the focal length, and, most importantly, it can be shorter than it (a normal lens cannot, its FF is measured approximately from the aperture).
    2. The PZO Amar and its cousin Mikar are creepy junk, both in design and in optical quality. They not only have lenses made of some kind of lousy glass, but they also often turn out to be skewed. Of course, a successful copy is not much worse than the Industar-23U, but still worse. Compared, checked.

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      06.02.2013

      This is exactly the case.

      Reply

  8. Valentine
    25.03.2013

    And I have a slightly different version of this lens (pancake), and there are 10 diaphragm blades in it.

    Reply

  9. Sergei
    05.04.2013
    • Arkady Shapoval
      05.04.2013

      The Poles probably have it at hand every day. I had a couple of days to review.

      Reply

  10. Sergei
    05.04.2013

    And here I got two pieces. But with a terrible mold.
    Help who can - how to disassemble it?
    Since an external examination, did not show any screws / hooks….

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      05.04.2013

      Oh, I won’t help. Maybe someone will unsubscribe.

      Reply

    • nukemall
      08.04.2013

      In this miracle of technology, everything is held by smooth nuts. See the front and back round lenses with steps / corrugations? They need to be unscrewed. For such work, I usually use something round, glued around the edge with an overhang with thick double-sided tape to make a cylinder with sticky walls and partly bottom, the resulting tool is pressed and twisted. After twisting the spins, the further becomes extremely clear.

      Reply

  11. runepo
    28.04.2013

    I have such a lens! Selling together with a plastic box to it! Only Ukraine write in cute runepo2012@ukr.net

    Reply

  12. Marina
    20.06.2013

    Hello!
    There are two brand new lenses for the 1984 Crocus AmarS 4,5 / 105 and MikarS 4,5 / 55

    Selling inexpensively ...

    Reply

  13. Valenitin
    12.10.2013

    Tell me? what kind of lens is Prodar PZO 5sm 1: 3,5, I found this one here, but the internet doesn't know anything about it ... Maybe you know something ...? Thanks.

    Reply

  14. Leonid
    07.12.2013

    Thank you very much for the review of the lens. Now I'm waiting for myself. when it comes, I will test and will definitely share my impressions of the lens in my blog http://www.drevilo.com/blog

    PS The day before yesterday I came across your site and now I am re-reading all the lens reviews. Thank you for your work!

    Reply

  15. B.R.P.
    11.10.2014

    shot with a black sock (as fur):
    https://yadi.sk/i/kcnagziJbvzLM

    Reply

  16. B.R.P.
    11.10.2014

    shot with a black sock (as fur):
    https://yadi.sk/i/dX5qgHkLbw2kY

    Reply

  17. Rodion
    13.01.2015

    I made a focuser for him from a plastic pipe, two M42 macro rings (medium and small) and two epoxy cups glued from paper. The lens itself is in a very crappy state - the remnants of enlightenment in the front have peeled off ... for 50r - the norm. I went through it, cleaned it, blackened it. In the world of photographic, sharpness seems to be at the level of Tair-11A, and bokeh resembles Tessarov's a bit. The contrast loses, the infection is strong.

    Reply

  18. Igor
    15.07.2015

    Yes, a great lens, no matter who says anything. It's just enough a FED lens as a focuser + a couple of small macro-rings ... well, and adjust infinity with the help of thin plastic spacers. MDF will be about 4 meters…. if you use helios instead of a helicoid, in theory, the MDF will decrease (a larger stroke of the helicoid), I have not tried it myself. It is imperative (so as not to scold the lens later) to insert a limiter (a plate with a hole about 2 cm in diameter) between the focuser and the lens - there will be no glare and the contrast is normal. A hood is required (I have a piece of plastic pipe about 7cm long.). Sharp and open, only chromite. At 8 - excellent. Sharp and 16. The most acceptable use is 8-11. If Industar 100U starts to lather after 8, then Amar works up to 16 without any questions. At infinity, sharpness is excellent. For macro ... in principle it is possible, only the unit is too long with macro rings. It is pointless to use without a limiter and a long hood.

    Reply

  19. B.R.P.
    15.06.2016

    In move

    Reply

  20. Don burlone
    05.05.2018

    I have an old, metal 10 petals and aperture 4.5-11.№16042 red letter R.
    I haven’t tried to shoot yet.

    Reply

  21. Alexey
    16.02.2023

    Amar, Mikar, Emitar - according to what scheme are they built? Or are they different?

    Reply

Reply

 

 

Top
mobility. computer