Canon Lens FD 55mm f / 1.2 SSC review

For the opportunity Lens FD 55mm f / 1.2 SSC Review Many thanks to Alexander from the Manual Optics section.

Canon Lens FD 55mm f / 1.2 SSC review

Canon Lens FD 55mm f / 1.2 SSC review

TTX Canon Lens FD 55mm f / 1.2 SSC:
Focal length: 55 mm
Diaphragm: F / 1.2-F / 16.0 (values ​​of 1.2, 2, 2.8, 4, 5.6, 8, 11, 16 can be set)
Number of aperture blades: 8 pieces
MDF: 0,6m
The weight: about 600g
Bayonet mount: Canon FD (in this case, reworked FD -> EF)
Front Filter Diameter: 58 mm

Please note that this Canon Lens FD 55mm f / 1.2 SSC can not be used on modern Canon EOS digital SLR cameras, since the Canon Lens FD 55mm f / 1.2 SSC has a FD type mount (mount to the camera), and all modern Canon digital cameras EOS have a Canon EF, EF-S mount. In this review, I used a Canon Lens FD 55mm f / 1.2 SSC lens converted to EF-S... If you do not deal with altering the lens, then you will need to use a special adapter Canon FD - Canon EF with a lens to get normal operation with the lens. The lens may degrade the image quality.

FD 55mm f / 1.2 from different sides

FD 55mm f / 1.2 from different sides

The lens has a brother Canon Lens FD 55mm f / 1.2 SSC Aspherical, which is one of the first lenses using aspherical elements. The lens of this Canon Lens FD 55mm f / 1.2 SSC review is often referred to as 55mm f / 1.2 pre-aspherical or 55mm f / 1.2 non-aspherical in order to distinguish between lenses. Also, in the Canon Lens FD lens range there are a lot of lenses of the 50mm F / 1.2 type. You can read how to use different non-autofocus lenses in the section old lenses at canon.

Canon Lens FD 55mm f / 1.2 SSC on the modern CZK

Canon Lens FD 55mm f / 1.2 SSC on the modern CZK

old man Canon Lens FD 55mm f / 1.2 SSC can show exorbitant image quality. When working with a lens, the first thing you notice is its weight. For an ordinary fifty dollars, Canon Lens FD 55mm f / 1.2 SSC It is simply huge. This is most likely the largest fifty-fifty (55mm) I've ever used. Together with the lens hood, the lens looks great on the camera.

Photo by Canon 55 1.2. Very small DOF, the image seems soft

Photo by Canon 55 1.2. Very small DOF, the image seems soft

The lens has a special SSC coating (Super Spectra Coating), which allows you to normally transfer side and backlight, and also helps to achieve excellent contrast in the image.

Sample photo on a Canon 55mm F1.2 FD

Sample photo on a Canon 55mm F1.2 FD

Focusing on the lens is very smooth. Focusing ring metal, not rubberized. The ring rotates a little more than 180 degrees with an easy flight for infinity and a flight for 60cm MDF. At the same time, the lens protrudes the trunk 0.5cm forward. When focusing, all lenses move together.

Sample photo on a Canon 55mm F1.2 FD

Sample photo on a Canon 55mm F1.2 FD

The diaphragm in my converted version has only manual control. Most likely, in the native state under the FD mount, the diaphragm had automatic control. The diaphragm ring rotates easily, with a nice click. DoFs are available for F / 4.0, 8, 11, 16 with a dot for infrared shift. The diaphragm has as many as 8 petals with a matte finish. Petals form a regular (not rounded) octagon.

Sample photo on a Canon 55mm F1.2 FD

Sample photo on a Canon 55mm F1.2 FD

Regarding F / 1.2: yes, 1.2 is huge aperture, it's as much as 2.25 times lighter for F / 1.8. Such aperture can help out in dark conditions. But focusing even in good conditions is very difficult; in dark conditions, focusing can be a problem.

Example photo on a Canon 55mm F1.2 FD. Bokeh

Example photo on a Canon 55mm F1.2 FD. Bokeh

Canon Lens FD 55mm f / 1.2 SSC. very well made lens. He is many years old, but he works perfectly. On modern cropped CZKs Canon EGF lens will match 88mm for Canon APS-C crop = 1,6x, And 71,5mm for Canon APS-H crop = 1,3x. This EGF very convenient for use in portrait photography. It's very good that Canon Lens FD 55mm f / 1.2 SSC. can be used without problems on full-frame cameras and on Canon APS-H cameras.

Example photograph on a Canon 55mm F1.2 FD

Sample photo on a Canon 55mm F1.2 FD

Image quality

The lens produces a good, sharp and contrasty image. On F1.2, aberrations are noticeable, which completely disappear if you set the aperture F2.8. The lens is devoid of distortion and vignetting on APS-C cameras. The lens is sharp even on F1.2 with a light soft effect that appears due to the very small depth of field. Unfortunately, I can only judge the lens when used on APS-C the camera. The bokeh of the lens is amazing, with discs in the blur zone similar to lemons. The image quality is on top.

Bokeh at full aperture

Bokeh at full aperture

Sample Photos

All photos taken on Canon 350D APS-C, crop=1.6x. Without processing. RAW – > JPEG 3MP, Q=85%, autolevels, added watermark with options EXIF. Pictures were taken using native protective filter Canon 58mm UV 1x and Canon S-60 60mm lens hoods (with clamping device for smaller diameter filters).

Personal experience:

The lens is very, very difficult to shoot at F1.2. The depth of field is very small. Focusing without Live View on 1.2 is very difficult. I had to shoot with bracketing focusing to pick up for a review of 20-30 photos with a normal sharpness of 1.2. Due to the need to remake old FD, FDn lenses for modern cameras, I come across the fact that they often take Nikon 50mm f / 1.2 AI-S Nikkor MF for Canon and used with Nikon F mount adapter - Canon EOS, which does not require lens. But personally to me the image with Canon Lens FD 55mm f / 1.2 SSC liked more for Nikon 50mm f / 1.2 AI-S Nikkor MF.

Photo by Canon 55 1.2

Photo by Canon 55 1.2

Comments on this post do not require registration. Anyone can leave a comment. Many different photographic equipment can be found on AliExpress.

How to use FL/FD/FDn mount lenses

To use a Canon FL, Canon FD, or Canon FDn mount lens on modern mirrorless cameras, you should use the appropriate adapter:

The adapters are suitable for FL, FD and FDn mount lenses, these mounts are backwards compatible. But using lenses with a Canon FL / Canon FD / Canon FDn mount on SLR cameras is difficult due to the long working distance. In such cases, a corrective lens adapter must be used, which will degrade the image quality.

Conclusions:

Canon Lens FD 55mm f / 1.2 SSC... - excellent super fast prime lens. For use on modern cameras requires some work. It attracts with a sharp contrasting image and good bokeh. Recommend.

Material prepared Arkady Shapoval. Training/Consultations | Youtube | Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | Telegram

Add a comment: Anatoly

 

 

Comments: 46, on the topic: Canon Lens FD 55mm f / 1.2 SSC review

  • Alexey

    thanks for the great review, Arkady! as always - the highest class, I have long wanted to know about the possibilities of fast fixes kenon! I really liked the bokeh. is it possible to use this lens on nikon?

    • Arkady Shapoval

      It’s very problematic on Nikon, it needs to be redone for the native Canon, and under Nikon it will be necessary to download more.

      • Misha

        Personally, he was holding the Canon FD 55 / 1.2, converted to Nikon, with an adapter for Canon. So if you have a lathe and hands growing from the right place, you can get that too;)

        • Oleg

          And with infinity, how were things going there?

  • Orestes

    Duzhe tsikaviy ob'єktiv. You can prick and fall into your hands.

  • Deimos

    Arkady, it will be very interesting to know the comparison of him with the modern "elka" if you have such an opportunity in the future

    • Arkady Shapoval

      L has 50mm, and this 55mm at 5 play a role.

  • Taras

    I use Canon 1.4 FD but on the EOS-FD adapter. It turns out a total focal length of 100mm and a loss of aperture ratio of almost 1,5 stops. Can you tell me who you can contact to be redone on EOS?

  • Novel

    Good afternoon!
    I really ask for your help! Bought Canon FD 50mm 1.4 SSC. To it is a chip adapter FD-EOS. The camera is the first penny. The adapter does not screw onto the carcass. Where did you go?
    Thank you for your reply!

  • Alexander

    Good afternoon! Thanks for the nice review. I have two questions for the author. How to distinguish Canon FD 55 / 1.2 Aspherical from non-aspherical - by markings or by serial numbers? How will this lens compare to the Rokkor 58 / 1.2 in terms of sharpness and design?

    • Sergei

      On Asperical, the word is engraved and filled with orange paint. You will see - you will not mix it up.

  • Igor

    And this lens, in my opinion, is emitting radiation ...? If so, what is your opinion on this ...

    • Gennady Lesnevsky

      No, the one in the review does not sound. The phonite is the one with the Aspherical prefix.
      Those. Radioactive glass is only available on the Canon FD 55mm f / 1.2 SSC Aspherical.
      And in the same radioactive background in Canon FL 58 mm f / 1.2.
      There is a lot of information about this on the Internet. It’s enough to simply drive in the search engine: “List of radioactive lenses” or “Radioactive lenses”.

      So the Canon FD 55mm f / 1.2 SSC is not radioactive!

  • Luda

    Hello)) Advise, please, the lens Canon FD 50mm 1: 1.4 appeared, I want to put it on the Canon 600 D, is this even possible ?? if yes, then
    Tell me how ??
    Thank you in advance))

    • Sergei

      You will need: a lathe, a drilling machine, a caliper, a micrometer 0-25. And of course the skill and a bit of cynicism.
      In general, this lens is very easy to remake under the EF-S. Things are much worse with the NFD50 / 1.2L because of the rear lens. For four months I suffered with him and racked my brains. But the result simply thrilled me!

  • Paul

    Good day. Now I use Pankolar MS 1.8 (portrait shooting) and SMC Takumar 1.4 (evening shooting + rooms, churches) on (Canon 60D). Should I sell Takumar and upgrade to Canon Lens FD 55mm f / 1.2 SSC? Thanks in advance.

  • Stas

    at full frame the mirror catches
    although infinity can be given covering the hole up to 5.6
    I do not know who needs infinity at 1.2
    the subject is simply super-duper for the edible and just for the portrait, and for these targets 5 meters is enough
    You can say that my favorite glass

  • Nick

    Radiation phonite. And the phonite is not very weak https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xyFr6vi_wsA

    • Gennady Lesnevsky

      No, the one in the review does not sound. The phonite is the one with the Aspherical prefix.
      Carefully read the text in that video, the link to which you gave, it says "Canon FD 55mm f / 1.2 SSC Aspherical", it is this model that is radioactive.

      And in the same radioactive background in Canon FL 58 mm f / 1.2.
      There is a lot of information about this on the Internet. It’s enough to simply drive in the search engine: “List of radioactive lenses” or “Radioactive lenses”.

      So the Canon FD 55mm f / 1.2 SSC is not radioactive!

  • Ivan

    without any problems it becomes on the Sony Nex series cameras. Without any alterations, using an adapter.

  • Arthur

    The lens is wonderful
    It was a difficult financial situation, I almost sold it
    But, fortunately, everything worked out
    You can’t sell it
    To the best of my ability, I prepared a small report explaining why:
    http://mihanev.ru/blog/canon-fd-55-mm-f-1-2-s-s-c.html

  • Alexander

    I use the younger brothers of this fifty dollars (fd50 1.4ssc and fd50 1.4) converted to eos. The image is excellent, unlike eos -1.4, it has an absolutely working hole, a contrast image, not soft, is eternal

    • Maria

      Alexander, can you help with the remake of 50 1.4 on eos? Just acquired and so far in complete confusion what to do. Do you have nowhere site or detailed instructions?

  • Denys Zharkov

    He is beautiful!

  • Simon

    Alteration of the lens:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bk9JkAJlB4o

  • Simon

    Striking examples of this lens ...
    http://mihanev.ru/blog/canon-fd-55-mm-f-1-2-s-s-c.html

  • Lizard lord

    I did not see the prohibitive quality of the picture, as promised. Takumar or rockcore for twenty bucks will do no worse

    • Stas

      20 they do not cost, at least 100. and open software more than that

  • anonym

    Guys in Canada have a master who is specifically engaged in remaking FD for EOS, or rather selling a kit for this alteration, for each lens the kit is different! the name of the company is EDMIKA and many prefer to use its adapters with FD glass instead of expensive modern lenses!

    • Matthew

      Thanks for the info!

  • Victor

    I tried to disassemble this lens to remake the shank for EF, but I can't unscrew the lens unit from the body. I unscrewed everything that was possible - it still does not get out. The aperture blade fell off - you can't put it back together ... Anything to advise? And then he is already aimed at working with gas keys, or a grinder ...

  • Ivan

    Buy such optics, offer

  • Paul

    The lens is of course good, but everything is learned in comparison ... It would be very interesting to compare it with olympus zuiko 55 1.2. Well, if possible with zuiko 50 1.2. A decent review would have turned out. Well, personally, I think that canon will lose. Despite the fact that appanents are almost 2 times smaller and lighter !!!

  • Matthew

    I liked the review very much, just thinking about this

  • Anatoly

    Hello. Please tell me. Is there a ready-made conversion kit for EOS on sale on Ali? Recently I got a lens in good condition Canon FD 55 / 1.2 SSC.

    • B. R. P.

      Are there such sets? For the alteration of manual Olympus, it seems there is.

      • Anatoly

        There are sets. But they cost $ 150. Unfortunately, I have not seen Ali yet. Probably you will have to do it yourself from the m42-EOS adapter. Another would be to find a sample aperture plate template.

  • Anatoly

    Here's an example site http://www.fdtoef.com

Add a comment

Copyright © Radojuva.com. Blog author - Photographer in Kiev Arkady Shapoval. 2009-2023

English-version of this article https://radojuva.com/en/2012/08/canon-fd-55mm-f-1-2-ssc/comment-page-1/?replytocom=489584

Versión en español de este artículo https://radojuva.com/es/2012/08/canon-fd-55mm-f-1-2-ssc/comment-page-1/?replytocom=489584