The action is over. But the essence of the action was as follows: You just guess what the photos are taken below.
In the comments you need to write the following.
- Camera model
- Focal length of the lens (all photos were taken at the same value of the focal length)
- Aperture (all photos were taken with the same value of the number F)
Or just guess the lens model itself, but it's already damn difficult.
Who is the first to guess receives Mikar / s 4,5 / 55 с macro rings For a present. Shipment in Ukraine by New Mail at my expense. Participants from other countries cannot pick up the prize. Of course, Mikar / s 4,5 / 55 this is not a plasma TV, but Radozhiva is built on other principles.
So:
1.
Sample photo on the lens
2.
Sample photo
3.
Sample photo
4.
Sample photo
5.
Sample photo
6.
Sample photo
7.
Sample photo
8.
Sample photo
9.
Sample photo
10.
Sample photo
11.
Sample photo
12.
Sample photo
13.
Sample photo
14.
Sample photo
Share the link to the actionmaybe someone will guess. I do not respond to comments in this article. Indicate your e-mail, on it I will contact the winner. Also, there will be a prize of viewers' (my) sympathies, this is also a lens for the best commentary, which will tell not about the parameters, but about the picture itself, which the lens gives, maybe something else interesting :)
The promotion was completed at 16.00 Kyiv time on 28.08.2012. Promotion results:
The results are mixed. Grand Prize Package Mikar / s 4,5 / 55 с macro rings already on his way to Donetsk to the winner Egor Moshchenko, who guessed the lens without prompting. But, due to the fact that Radozhiva “hung up” and “turned on” the section with the last gallery on the title pages, users became available EXIF snapshots from the review Emmitar / s. Therefore, the prize of audience sympathy remains with Radozhiva.
Thank you all for your participation and torment in trying to make out the lens. Personally, it was very interesting for me to read and respond to your comments. This was the first and I hope not the last action from Radozhiva. Next time I will try to ensure a more stable operation of the site and a simpler task.
Help to the project. Thanks for attention. Arkady Shapoval.
But you could guess that this is a zoom
More than an hour has passed before people began to really think :)
Oh, one more clue =)
Then so
Nikon 24-120mm / 120 mm / 5.6 and this time the easiest D40
I am tying all up to indulge in, good night to all, bright thoughts and victory. In the morning I’ll read the battles =)
I sleep too. I will moderate the comments in the morning!
I do not know. As for me, it was shot on the DX format.
Most likely Nikon d200.
Lens:
1.Focal length: 50mm
2.Vega-11U
Vega-11U very good lens.
I look at the photo, but the sharpness is not enough.
And the vega is very sharp.
And the number of attempts is limited.?
Unlimited if you will argue your thoughts.
Hmm, I think this is a D700 with Super-Takumar 1.9 / 85 mm f / 1.9
Super-Takumar will have a brighter picture :)
Vega-12B D200 90mm / 2,8
the blur zone is similar to vega and the sharpness is similar :)
I judge only by examples of photos. And I'm not a connoisseur.
Anyway - thanks for trying :)
Greetings, Arkady! an interesting action .. I think it was filmed on the initial camera d40, maybe d80. focal 85 mm. Something from the Soviet 6 petals, very similar to helios, but not helios. bokeh is not twisted) aperture - about 4 judging by the blur in the picture 9))
Alex, thank you, you have identified an excellent deductive method. I advise everyone not to guess, but really estimate the focal :)
It seems to me that this was by no means taken off by fifty dollars. As for me, this is some kind of telephoto lens, with fr 135-200 (at a glance) - the foreground is very characteristicly separated and looks like a full frame, so Nikon D700, with an aperture of 2,8-3,5 approximately, judging by "Nuts" ;-)
Bright thought :)
in focal length it can be ju37a 135mm
or maybe not 135mm
I greet you Arkady.
My opinion is that this is D200 Nikon
Helios 81 50/2 lens and aperture 2.0
I got very similar photos with the same bokeh.
Revised again and my answer helios81
Thanks for participating.
Wow) For the first time on a joyful event, it’s very interesting :)
I'll try to think and maybe make my assumption. The focal length is rather considerable, the aperture is completely open, which is on this lens, it’s hard to say whether it’s shot on crop or ff, but for some reason it seems to be on crop. If on the crop, the focal length is about 80-100mm (aether 150), the aperture seems to be considerable, somewhere around 2.8) I would have known Soviet glass or imported :) and if I knew Radozhiva, there must be something interesting and complicated, unusual glass)
the first assumption, although I think it’s still not it, but you have to start somewhere: Nikon AF Nikkor 80 mm f / 2.8
It is a pity that I saw the article late :(
A very good deductive method. By the way, you can specify either focal or ether - it makes no difference to me.
still similar in sharpness to veg12b if you shoot on crop, the focus area on the pictures is very similar.
Looks like I don’t argue.
Maybe some of the similar lenses in the same series for the enlarger, like a gift? Well, not a 55mm micar, maybe Amar 105 / 4,5?
No, this is not amar.
Or how my first guess was at 80mm - EMITAR / S 4.5 / 80 PZO Macro Poland Lens M42?
And what were they guided by?
Well, focal, as it seems to me, in the range of 80-100mm, well, the sharpness is very good, but the aperture is fully open, and good sharpness at a fully open aperture is similar to a lens with a photomagnifier. Am I on the right track? Stumbled upon another “suitable for my criteria” version of the Emitar 4/76 on the Internet?
Good analysis, have you checked your mail for a long time?
The more I think the more options) we can assume that this is a telephoto in which there are a lot of petals and was shot with a 2,8 aperture
At a fully open aperture, it doesn't matter what aperture is, and how many blades - the blur zone will be flat.
At first, I also thought that it was Vega-12B 2.8 / 90 and Nikon D40. The bokeh pattern is very similar. But when the emitar-80mm tab with photos appeared on the Key Thoughts panel, it seems this is the same D40 + Emitar S f4.5 / 80mm :))))))
Which panel?
Who is looking for EXIF, there is a good one for one of the photos: http://500px.com/photo/12627851
5 and 9 maybe Helios-44,
6, 10 and possibly 3 is Jupiter-37a.
Well, without Nikkorovskiy fifty dollars could not do. types 13 and 14. are different, most likely.
although not sure, the eyes are not the same.
other lenses do not know so well.
Wow, the title says it’s shot all on one lens :)
once again convinced that I know very little, thanks for the site is very informative.
not at all.
http://500px.com/photo/12627851
Why such data in exif? And I feel the super-popular d800 review is brewing soon? :)
Everything is very simple - my task is to confuse so that it is the analyzing photo that gets to the finish line, and not the one looking for easy ways :) as soon as the cards open, I will enter the correct data :)
Thank you so much for such an interesting action =) It was very interesting! It’s immediately obvious that you follow the portal as if you were your brainchild. It is always very nice, all the reviews are from the heart, but not for the sake of commerce. Keep it up and thanks again!
It's my pleasure. Okay, I'll go for a walk.
If you analyze the photos taken with a 50k and 70-300 telephoto, then the soul lies more that the photos were taken by a 150mm telephoto, the camera is probably d40, but due to the focus points it can be d90
The last 50kom pictures would probably be clearly expressed all the same ..
who reads the comments, the information is not fifty dollars.
Last pictures would be with pronounced nuts
Maybe so.
For focal, it seems to me somewhere in the range of 80-135mm. Judging by the circles in the blur zone, the diaphragm blades are 6 pieces. Good sharpness, color reproduction, contrast. So if it really is not Emitar / s with an enlarger, then maybe pentacon auto 2.8 135 mm?
This is not a Pentacon