The action is over. But the essence of the action was as follows: You just guess what the photos are taken below.
In the comments you need to write the following.
- Camera model
- Focal length of the lens (all photos were taken at the same value of the focal length)
- Aperture (all photos were taken with the same value of the number F)
Or just guess the lens model itself, but it's already damn difficult.
Who is the first to guess receives Mikar / s 4,5 / 55 с macro rings For a present. Shipment in Ukraine by New Mail at my expense. Participants from other countries cannot pick up the prize. Of course, Mikar / s 4,5 / 55 this is not a plasma TV, but Radozhiva is built on other principles.
So:
1.
Sample photo on the lens
2.
Sample photo
3.
Sample photo
4.
Sample photo
5.
Sample photo
6.
Sample photo
7.
Sample photo
8.
Sample photo
9.
Sample photo
10.
Sample photo
11.
Sample photo
12.
Sample photo
13.
Sample photo
14.
Sample photo
Share the link to the actionmaybe someone will guess. I do not respond to comments in this article. Indicate your e-mail, on it I will contact the winner. Also, there will be a prize of viewers' (my) sympathies, this is also a lens for the best commentary, which will tell not about the parameters, but about the picture itself, which the lens gives, maybe something else interesting :)
The promotion was completed at 16.00 Kyiv time on 28.08.2012. Promotion results:
The results are mixed. Grand Prize Package Mikar / s 4,5 / 55 с macro rings already on his way to Donetsk to the winner Egor Moshchenko, who guessed the lens without prompting. But, due to the fact that Radozhiva “hung up” and “turned on” the section with the last gallery on the title pages, users became available EXIF snapshots from the review Emmitar / s. Therefore, the prize of audience sympathy remains with Radozhiva.
Thank you all for your participation and torment in trying to make out the lens. Personally, it was very interesting for me to read and respond to your comments. This was the first and I hope not the last action from Radozhiva. Next time I will try to ensure a more stable operation of the site and a simpler task.
Help to the project. Thanks for attention. Arkady Shapoval.
i96u
Carefully read the terms of the action, you need to specify the camera model, focal length, and aperture.
1. Nikon D90
2mm
3. F3.5
Mauger Janpol color?
Wow, real amateur photographers read to Radozhiva!
I thought to cheat and downloaded the EXIF Viewer plugin - but alas, there is no data in the photos. (
I have deliberately removed EXIF. But, you wondered how to do it - this is very important!
1. Nikon d40
2. HELIUS 44-4 (focal 58mm)
3. aperture 2.0 (open)
Lens GelsУc does not exist.
i96u 3,5 \ 50
It looks like a matrix with dust, or a little lens is shabby
This is already a good, good comment, the first on the list of author's sympathy and a lens as a gift :)
fir-trees, Duc this is Mikar / s 4,5 / 55 on Nikon d700)
Wait until the promotion ends, and you will be surprised very seriously.
Pictures were taken using the M42-Nikon adapter + 1cm macro ring.
why such a conclusion?
glancing once more at the blur circles, I believe that this is still helios, but for some reason 6 petals
Helios have a Biotar scheme, and geometric vignetting, which means that Helios would have to twist the "bokeh". Although, I tried very hard to confuse the tracks.
I will risk: Nikon D300, Jupiter-9 85mm f2.0
I really liked your comment! You also fall into the list of copyright favorites.
and let aperture 2,8
Let) 2.8 is a good aperture :)
g-81H at 2,8
If this is Helios, then due to the Biotar scheme, the circles in the blur zone would be slightly twisted, and even on 2.8 nuts would be slightly visible. But you are getting closer and closer :)
so on 3 and 4 in my opinion you can see the nuts ...
Read the rules: Aperture (all photos were taken with the same value of the number F)
I venture to suggest that Nikon D200 and Industar-61 with f2.8
The D200 is a great camera.
1) D200
2) 55mm
3) 4
PS. Can you have several options? =)
It is possible, but try to justify.
nuuu, at 2,8 open, either i61l \ z or mir1v is suitable, and if the pictures are with beskon, then this is the mabie Sonya Neks
There may be many more options.
28.08.12, 0: 06
morning has already begun, but there’s still no answer)))
Trying poorly.
I have a suspicion that the prize was shot, because option 2
1) D700
2) 55
3) Mikar 4,5
Do you have another chance to get a prize for copyright :)
but in general it’s cool here with you =)
Well, Radozhiva tries to be a good site with me :)
there is a serious suspicion that this is generally glass from a rangefinder! the macro is shot with the rings as is, and the general plan with a working distance of 28,8 can be shot only with a large focal length.
Since I’m glad to post photos from Nikon more often, I guess Nikon. Based on the input, the output
1. entry-level camera nikon d40 / d60
2.focal 135 mm (most likely - Jupiter-11 rangefinder - I tried this with a canon, the drawing is very close!)
3.the diaphragm is fully open - 4,0
Such a lightly crazy idea, my dear colleague)))
I like the way you think, you began to analyze, and not just guess. Copyright sympathies!
about mikar already - it did not fit)
Well, why, maybe just the camera was not correctly indicated.
Was this lens happy in the reviews?
With the terms of the promotion, I can not answer this question :)
still Mikar / s 4,5 / 55 on the open, with a ring on d80)
It would be very interesting to read the argument.
It seems that the nature of the bokeh is similar, and either I have already looked closely and it's time to sleep, or in fact there is a small vignette around the edges, so I am in favor of the option with a full frame and a micar on an open aperture.
Strange, I will give a huge hint and write to all the participants - this is not Mikar / s. Mikar / s is a gift for the winner.
I shot on the lenses with enlargers and with rings, including. very similar to your shots turned out. a box. the box was found on your reviews, but not often, something was wrong with it, but the dust on the pictures. something like that)
The box is not important, name the brand of the lens or the parameters of the focal / aperture and become the winner.
And the correct answer was Canon 1000D with a whale at 5,6 =)
You read my mind, my first thought was to create a stock based on the Canon 350d and a whale lens.
Well, the owners of the canons were not deprived, the review will be 1000d)
Owners deprive themselves of themselves, rarely give Canon a test.