The stock is over. The essence of the action was as follows: you just guess what the photos below were taken. Everything is shot on one lens.
In the comments you need to write the following.
- Or: the camera model, the focal length of the lens (all photos were taken at the same focal length) and the maximum aperture of the lens.
- Or: just guess the lens model itself
Be sure to indicate your e-mail address, which will be used to communicate with the winner and a small comment explaining its findings. Who is the first to guess receives Amar 4,5 / 105 For a present... Transfer across Ukraine by New Mail at my expense. Competitors from other countries will not be able to claim the prize. Of course, this is not a brand new monitor, but then Radozhiva is built on different principles.
So:
1.
Sample photo on a stock lens
2.
Sample photo on a stock lens
3.
Sample photo on a stock lens
4.
Sample photo on a stock lens
5.
Sample photo on a stock lens
6.
Sample photo on a stock lens
7.
Sample photo on a stock lens
8.
Sample photo on a stock lens
9.
Sample photo on a stock lens
10.
Sample photo on a stock lens
11.
Sample photo on a stock lens
12.
Sample photo on a stock lens
13.
Photo. Flowers in motion from strong winds
14.
Sample photo on a stock lens
15.
Sample photo on a stock lens
All photos in the gallery without processing, on-camera JPEG. Photos prepared for publication using Adobe Lighroom, Q = 80%. The action lasts until someone guesses.
Good luck.
Promotion results:
The winner is Vladimir. The correct answer is Yashica Auto Yashinon-DX 1: 1,7 f = 50mm. The prize will be awarded personally by agreement in the city of Kiev. Many participants were confused by the swirling bokeh, but if you look closely, it is exactly the "cat's eye" and does not twist as much as many Helios. Everything was filmed on Nikon D700.
Help to the project. Thanks for attention. Arkady Shapoval.
Maybe it's Makro-Planar 60 / 2.8 and D40 camera or Planar 85 / 1.4
Who will give me Planar 85 \ 1.4 for review?
good morning!
judging by the boke, I will assume that this is an industrial-61l \ s
On the closed diaphragms Industar-61 LZ does it give such wonderful nuts as in the photo in the example?
can. They were not only with a toothed diaphragm (as in full-61), but also with a traction shape. I’ve been like this since I was 9
Planar 100 / 2.8 is more suitable for plastic
Planar is a good option.
Good morning everyone!) According to the first photo, it immediately seemed that it was Helios, but some kind of torsion is not so, it looks like an import. I think that the photos were taken on a d700, a fixed lens with a focal length in the region of 50mm, most likely the M42 with a lensless adapter. Aperture is large. I would venture to make the first guess: Asahi Super-Takumar 50 mm f / 1.4. :)
With the return, Egor, you damn right made all the comments.
Arkady, can I congratulate Egor? )))
No, while this nut is too tough for him, although the approach is very, very correct.
Well, I just can’t leave this line of Planar 1.4 or 1.7
Planar 1.4 or 1.7 / 50mm
Work in the same way.
Interesting, but difficult however)) is it possible Cosinon 50 mm f / 1.8, also 6 aperture blades?
Arkady, give a hint at least 50/50
1) this is Japanese
2) this is a German
3) this is Soviet glass
4) another option
The participants almost guessed.
What is this tessar 45mm 2.8? although I think it is unlikely (
You think correctly. But now, if you write that tessar, then motivate.
I think that it’s a fascist or Japanese uroskaplenochny)))
you are not alone, yesterday I also proposed how many Japanese and Germans, and Arkady is picky, all do not suit him =)
Not that much was offered. Just look if there is even a correct answer without explanation - it will not be accepted.
I looked at the planars so they have a very similar bokeh with a photo and Tessar is the oldest of all that I suggested, I just have doubts about it with the veto (
They did very right that they looked towards the planars.
tessar gives round balls more like a soccer ball in American football))) Well, plastic is of course. Sorry, I don’t know how to comment professionally)
Everything is fine, you just need to write at least something, and just guessing does no honor to anyone.
Biotar 58 mm f / 2 and a number of Helios analogs according to the glass scheme can give such a good picture and sharpness
Biotars twist the background stronger. Twist to disgrace. And this one is soft.
so can this sonar? if you take it cheaper then type of jupiter3 or 8th
Sonnar does not give such a drawing.
I’ve gotten my brains out, maybe this is Petzval 85mm? On the crop, torsion is not as noticeable as on the medium format, the same lemons in the bokeh.
and focal can well be.
I advise you to decide on the focal one, and then think about other parameters.
Carl Zeiss MC PANCOLAR 50 / 1.8 and Helios-77 give a soft background
The one that you and Helios have settled.
maybe it’s: the camera model -Nikon D200 focal length of the lens is -50mm, and the lens is still Helios 81N its torsion, aperture from 2 to 16.
Not D200.
Zenitar-M (50 / 1,7) if you consider the softness of this option, he will be less sharp than helios
Not Zenitar-M
Then another planar 50/2 surfaced
Not him.
All Arkady I will say thank you to everyone, my opinion is still that this is a planar zeis
because I think the contrast and sharpness are soft against the background of these glasses or maybe their analogs.
Thank you for updating knowledge) Good luck to everyone!
This is really a planar type, but what kind?
Well vsmysle analogue right?
well yes :)
Another option is Carl Zeiss Planar 50 / 1.4 or Carl Zeiss Planar 50 / 1.7. It seems like a focal 50, Compared with his own. Something like bokeh in the photo from the review http://evtifeev.com/?p=5695 In my conclusion, I took into account your hint that this lens has not yet participated in your reviews.
I would be damn interested in what Yevtifeev would say, he is a good connoisseur of Planarov.
so I kinda like Soviet analogs, maybe I just missed in millimeters) so maybe it's generally Nikon 501.4 with the designation if)))
For the activity I give another hint - the analogue is also Japanese. I think you can guess in no time.
Nikkor MF 50 / 1.4 Ai-s, Nikkor MF 55 / 1.2 Ai-s only saw two
no