The stock is over. The essence of the action was as follows: you just guess what the photos below were taken. Everything is shot on one lens.
In the comments you need to write the following.
- Or: the camera model, the focal length of the lens (all photos were taken at the same focal length) and the maximum aperture of the lens.
- Or: just guess the lens model itself
Be sure to indicate your e-mail address, which will be used to communicate with the winner and a small comment explaining its findings. Who is the first to guess receives Amar 4,5 / 105 For a present... Transfer across Ukraine by New Mail at my expense. Competitors from other countries will not be able to claim the prize. Of course, this is not a brand new monitor, but then Radozhiva is built on different principles.
So:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
All photos in the gallery without processing, on-camera JPEG. Photos prepared for publication using Adobe Lighroom, Q = 80%. The action lasts until someone guesses.
Good luck.
Promotion results:
The winner is Vladimir. The correct answer is Yashica Auto Yashinon-DX 1: 1,7 f = 50mm. The prize will be awarded personally by agreement in the city of Kiev. Many participants were confused by the swirling bokeh, but if you look closely, it is exactly the "cat's eye" and does not twist as much as many Helios. Everything was filmed on Nikon D700.
Help to the project. Thanks for attention. Arkady Shapoval.
No. 5 helios 81n
Read the terms of the action, you need a little comment on why it is.
Quickly =)
I read the reviews on the previous action, people liked it, so it will continue :)
The diaphragm is less than 4, the dog’s nose is no longer in the DOF, but not more than 2.
Let's start small =)
1) D 40
2) 50 mm
3) a hole of 2,8 (did not understand, indicate the maximum aperture on the lens, or which one was shot?)
Indicate the maximum aperture of the lens.
№ 1
tair 11 ???
Read the terms of the action, you need a little comment on why this is the lens.
Although I took a look, the diaphragm value changed, if it was open with little flowers, the rounds were slightly elongated, oval, then the tree was already covered, hex nuts appeared, which means a lens with 6 aperture blades. The train of thought is correct, Arkady?
The train of thought is wonderful!
Can I have a hint? This lens was already present in the reviews on our favorite resource?
there are 15 photos on different apertures, which is even more of a clue :)
It's just that in my untrained eye, the background blur pattern is similar to Takumar 1: 1.9 / 85
And what exactly does it look like?
I do not think that this time I will open America.
camera - here the colors are different than last time. more familiar or something ... I'm afraid to blaspheme, assuming kenon, but the absence of pictures with infinity speaks in favor of nikon. More likely a crop, although there is a slight vignetting. something level d80? The adapter is clearly without a lens (the lens pattern is clean and unclouded by excess low-quality glass)
now the most delicious. my fabrication on glass.
Judging by the bokeshke - Helios, but clearly not Helios-40. remains 81n, 44 series. 44-2 and just 44 with M39 landing disappear immediately - they have more than 6 blades in the diaphragm. Against the light, the pictures are quite contrasting and colored, which means they are not 44M (there was no MC version). Remains 81n and the line MC Helios-44M-5 ... 7 (44m4 in the MC version did not come across either).
the limit of the diaphragms in which the twist on Helios is small is, therefore, it was closed by no more than 4.
Obviously not Tair-11 or 11A.
HA! and now I’ll cross out all my logic. Helios 44M's is too simple an answer. Therefore, the rangefinder Jupiter-3 1,5 / 50 is somehow incredibly screwed onto a crop with a working length of 46,5))
The train of thought is excellent. I have not written a single review with an adapter with a lens, it is better to lose infinity than distortion of the lens.
judging by the answer, this is neither Helios nor Jupiter-3))
Everything can be :)
If my vision does not fail me, then the photo shows a twisted bokeh. So this is some kind of planar. Since there is no photo from a long distance. and you have nikon, we can assume that it is something with M42 thread. Planar with M42 - I think this is some kind of helios from the 44th, the twist is not too noticeable at the edges, which means the camera is cropped. I will assume that this is Helios 44-3. Am I right somewhere?)
Yes, they are right in that you analyze, act.
Based on what I have already written, and on that fruit, which seems to be far away for a lens with an adapter without a lens, I will say that this is Helios 81-H. And the Lemon bokeh circles are also similar to those drawn by 81-H.
Really there are no other lenses among manual optics, but only Helios-81N :)
Hmm) If so, maybe this is Pankolar 1.8? Also, circles elongated in the blur zone are similar.
As for me, the pear and chestnut are quite far away so as not to go beyond the focus of the lensless adapter.
With MDF, the picture is better viewed, therefore, I photograph small details.
If you look at the bokeh of the first and fourth shots, I’ll assume that it is the 44th HELIOS
As for me, Helios 44 turns more “fiercely”.
Twisted bokeh and kind rozmitiy background and background are similar to 50mm nashtovuyut on a little thought scho ts Zenitar-M 50 1.7
Does Zenitar twist the background so much?
Ai spravdi) todi shche option - Helios 77m-4)
Try to write explanations :)
It seems to me that it's still Helik 81, it’s very similar to twisting the bokeh
Everything can be. But if so, then the first comment was correct :)
and you continue to drive us further =)
If this is a planar and not helios, then perhaps some Zeiss is the progenitor of the scheme?
I answer without deceiving anyone.
did not want to offend you
Biotar 2/58?
Yes, Arkady is a master of fogging) but the idea with a guessing game is gorgeous! Sorry if this is offtopic in this context.
All is correct. Once again, you will be surprised at the answer. Arkady is written with big :)
so the biotar has 2/58 12 petals, and here judging by the nuts only 6.
I am tormented by vague doubts that you are again tormenting us with some Polish meager? = D
This time I’m not driving my nose. Waiting for sensible comments.
Judging by the four photos, I will assume from bokeh that it is Helios 44-2)
Thanks for the guess.
Also another option is that it is Helios 44-4
You can list all options Helios-44m-X and Helios-44-X
OK)
Helios-44
Helios-44-2
Helios-44-3
Helios-44M
Helios-44M-4
Helios-44K-4
MS Helios-44M-5
MS Helios-44M-6
MS Helios-44M-7
Thank you, for a more extended answer to the question "why exactly the Helios-44X, Helios-44M-X series?"
from all helios?
can. I even lean towards the second group - among them there are multilayered ones. not MS in the examples would have worked worse (I have already compared the work of 44m and MS 44M-6 against a light bulb). In favor of the 44M-x line and hex nuts in some photos, and the 44m has an eight-blade diaphragm, and somehow strangely deployed.
I’ll venture to suggest that this is the same D40, focal in the range of 50-90mm, and it seems to me that this is not helios. As for me, it is somewhat similar to Vega 12B or Wave 9 MS.
There is some truth in the commentary.
what not helios?
This will be a clear hint and will drop a whole bunch of lenses.
most likely about focal =)
Since this should be something unusual, then why not German optics =)
And since we observe geometric vignetting in the form of a swirling bokeh, designed to compensate for the shortcomings of the Planar scheme, it is possible this time we have a German scout:
Perhaps planar 1.7 / 50?
Also a good option.
well yes… :)
There will be no obvious clues, and think so well.
Have you noticed a comment on Pankolar 1.8?) Is that it?
I noticed. If it was him, you would receive a letter “You are the winner” in the mail.
Thanks, okay. Faster would have guessed, eager to find out what it is)
We are waiting for Egor =)
I wrote him a contact. Let them guess.
maybe it is industrial 50-2 or industrial-69
I see that you follow the latest Radozhiva reviews perfectly :)
I’ll propose another option. If this is not helios and hardly Zeiss, then we can assume that this is Industar 50-2. Swirling background, bokeh in the form of lemons on the open diaphragm and hexagons on the covered one speak in his favor.
Damn, every time I write a comment someone ahead of me)
:D
Honestly, Radozhiva does not read thoughts.
Well, he has 7 coal nuts, so the Indian also disappears
Great deductive method.
Hindu twists background? some kind of strange Indian!
Twists, and also twists https://radojuva.com.ua/wp-content/uploads/sg/industar-50-2/industar-50-2-review-18.jpg
world sadness ((for some reason I do not twist ... 71 year old copy, with traces of disassembly
Which version? There are many Hindus, not everyone twists fanatically.
50-2, 7 aperture diaphragm, black
Strange, the industry is a little twist, you can see my last review of I96U. Maybe the scenes were filmed, where is this effect difficult to catch?
Arkady, and I’ll go on exotic optics
New candidate from the land of the rising sun
Revuenon 1.4 / 55
6 petal, twists bokeh, in the open circles have an ovoid shape.
We know this :)
Accura Supertel 85 / 1.9 also falls under the description of the suspect.
I would not refuse to write a review of such a lens.
but for some reason it seems to me that it could be a full-frame D700 and a lens like something like a Vega-12B twists very much like 6 petals. most likely I'm wrong, but I think that on d700 will give a similar picture
Another 10-20 such actions, and we will all be very well versed in technology.
brain break ... :) Good night everyone.
Thanks. I’m going to rest too. Tomorrow you need to write a review of this miracle :)
while I’m holding on, I’ll be closely following Pts for an hour and a half for sure, I still print photos anyway.
but about exoticism - it is unlikely that something is just unrealistically rare. the suspect is most likely known. otherwise how to calculate it?
Well, I personally did not know the hero of the last contest, so our dear photographer can still find something exotic = D
Yes, the lens is known.
I can assume that this is the Kaleinar-5n 100mm F2.8 MC, which also has 6 aperture blades, and the characteristic bokeh of this glass. But the very small depth of field is embarrassing, as if for 2,8 this is not typical, but still my answer is this.
For 100mm and 2.8 too, the depth of field is very small. Thanks for the idea.
Is there pressed glass in the lens?
And here they put me in a stupor. It is difficult for me to answer this question.