Nikon D7000 review

For the opportunity Nikon D7000 Review many thanks to Igor

Review of the Nikon D7000 body. Near Vega-11U.

Review of the Nikon D7000 body. Near Vega-11U.

Nikon D7000 is a very unusual digital SLR camera. On the one hand, it has some indicators better than professional cameras Nikon D300, D300s, on the other hand: Nikon D7000 does not reach the professional level. Historically, the Nikon D7000 is difficult to attribute to one of two categories, therefore, I will dwell on this in more detail.

Signs of a Nikon D7000 indicating a professional level:

  • Compatible with old manual (non-studded) lenses AI-S. The camera works perfectly with any manual lens, even with non-native AI compatible.
  • The presence of two slots for memory cards
  • Save option 14-bit RAW File
  • Dustproof and waterproof
  • 100% frame coverage in the viewfinder, a clean viewfinder
  • The presence of over short excerptsequal to 1 / 8000s.

Signs indicating that the Nikon D7000 refers to amateur (amateur cameras)

  • At the camera part of the body is made of plastic. The case is not all made of metal alloy, as in older models D200, D300, D300s.
  • The camera does not support quick cards CF
  • Frame buffer total 9 (maybe 10) RAW shots
  • The burst speed is fixed and does not expand with the booster
  • Well, of course, the presence of automatic modes of use, as in a number of models Nikon D80, D90.
  • Camera does not allow saving uncompressed RAW file

I stand in solidarity with Nikon, which classifies the Nikon D7000 as an amateur camera. It so happened that the line of professional cameras is Nikon D100, D200, D300, D300s, D500. In turn, the range of cameras Nikon D70, D70s, D80, D90 has been improved and supplemented by Nikon D7000 cameras, D7100, D7200, D7500. You can see for yourself composed by me Nikon camera geneology chart. Therefore, the Nikon D7000 is simply an improved level of advanced amateur cameras, but not a professional line.

Review of the Nikon D7000 body. Redesigned shooting mode selector.

Review of the Nikon D7000 body. Redesigned shooting mode selector.

The most important thing in the Nikon D7000 for the photographer:

1. CMOS sensor in 16.2 megapixels DX format with crop factor 1.5x. The same matrix is ​​in Nikon D5100. The same number of megapixels in the flagship Nikon D4. The number of megapixels is not so importantbut the working range of ISO is 100-6400 and expands to 25.600. Believe the range ISO 100-25.600 - this is already serious. Moreover, we can say that at ISO 3200 you can very often get a satisfactory result. Funny, but Nikon released an amateur Nikon D3200which has as much as 24MP. True, the quality of pictures at high ISOs is much worse than full-frame cameras, such as D700, D3 etc.

Very similar to the fact that Nikon D7000 uses a matrix that Sony produces, the same matrix is ​​available in cameras

Photo on Nikon D7000

Photo on Nikon D7000

2. Burst speed 6 fps. It is worth noting that the D7000 did realize fast shooting with 14 bit RAW without losing the shooting speed. D300(s) loses shooting speed at 14 bit RAW, in fact D300(s) speed with 14 bit RAW is poor 2.5 fps. 6 fps for the Nikon D7000 is very good. I do not recommend chasing a rapid-fire camera, very often the rate of fire is not important at all. For example, in a studio, flashes are sometimes recharged within one second, and few people shoot faster than 2 fps. For home and leisurely photography I have enough Nikon D40 and 2.5 fps. But high shooting speed is important for reporting, unfortunately high speed requires a good buffer size. The buffer is where pictures are stored in the camera before being written to the memory card. An analogy can be drawn that the buffer is the camera's RAM, and the card is its hard drive. The Nikon D7000 has a small buffer, see below.

Review of the Nikon D7000 body. Rear view camera. The main panel of buttons.

Review of the Nikon D7000 body. Rear view camera. The main panel of buttons.

3. The number of frames in the buffer depends on the image recording format. What interests me most is the buffer when shooting in RAW format, and for maximum 14bit RAW quality with lossless compressionhe makes up 9 frames. With a shooting speed of 6 fps, the camera starts to slow down after the second second of shooting. You immediately understand that the D7000 is far from a professional camera. Here are other buffer metrics:

  1. JPEG maximum quality, quality priority with disabled ADL, Noise reduction, High ISO Noise reduction, etc. - 15 frames.
  2. JPEG maximum quality, quality priority with ADL, Noise reduction, High ISO Noise reduction, etc. - 11 frames.
  3. RAW 12bit lossless compression - 9 frames, the file weighs about 12MB
  4. RAW 12bit normal compression - 9 frames, the file weighs about 11MB
  5. RAW 14bit lossless compression (the absolute maximum quality for Nikon D7000) - 9 frames, the file weighs about 20MB
  6. RAW 14bit normal compression - 9 frames, the file weighs about 15MB

Frame buffer is one of the most important indicators of camera speed... Even my old lady Nikon D200 squeezes 21 frames of continuous shooting and gives as much as 4 seconds of shooting without brakes in a series of 5 fps. The camera buffer of the Nikon D7000 in RAW mode greatly disappointed, I don’t know what those who say about the professionalism of Nikon D7000 think.

Photo on Nikon D7000

Photo on Nikon D7000

4. Nikon D7000 has convenient help with tips, different shooting modes like “night portrait” or “sports”. The camera has a convenient photo editing system. For those who are too lazy to mess around with editing programs on a computer, the Nikon D7000 has an excellent image editor built in. Also, in addition to JPEG processing, the Nikon D7000 camera supports RAW processing.

Black shutter button on the D7000. View of the shutter button and monochrome display.

Black shutter button on the D7000. View of the shutter button and monochrome display.

5. The display of the camera is excellent, with 920.000 pixels. The display is very large and bright. Viewing images on the display is a pleasure. The same display is on Nikon D90, D300, D300s, D700, D3 etc.

Photo on Nikon D7000

Photo on Nikon D7000 Neutral Picture Control

6. The ergonomics of the camera is excellent. The additional display helps a lot. It is very convenient to configure the basic parameters for an external monochrome display. The external monochrome display has a backlight. U1, U2 modes allow you to save all the necessary settings and quickly switch between the settings of the camera U1 and U2.

Example photo on Nikon D7000

Example photo on Nikon D7000

7. Nikon D7000 supports AF lenses without built-in focus motor. For example, Nikon D7000 will work fine without motor cheap and high quality lenses. Nikon 50mm F1.8D, Nikon 85mm F1.8D, Nikon 70-210mm F4.0AF etc. And also, Nikon D7000 gives the chance to work with AI, AI-S and any other old lenses. For example, the camera can easily make friends with manual lenses Nikon 50mm f / 1.2 AI-s Nikkor, Helios-81H, and Nikon 100mm F / 2.8 Series E etc .. If you specify the parameters of the manual lens in the camera menu, then matrix metering will be available exposure... The camera can store 9 'non-CPU' lenses (the same number in the more serious D300s / D3s / D3X). Only the following DX cameras could work with old lenses: Nikon D200, D300, D300s. Nikon D7000 uses a unique focus module Multi-CAM 4800DX with 39 sensors (9 cruciform)which is the same as a full-frame camera Nikon D600... 39 focus points are enough for any kind of photography. Focusing accuracy and speed are highly dependent on the lens rather than the focusing system. And the camera has a new one 2016 pixel RGB sensor measuring exposure.

Nikon D7000 - rear view

Nikon D7000 - Back View

9. Viewfinder 100%. This means the following: what you see in the viewfinder when you zoom in is fully consistent with what will be in the photo. Typically, coverage is 95% of the frame. For example, Nikon D90 also 95% and often at the edges of the photo extra details appear, since they are not visible in the viewfinder. A trifle, but very nice.

Example photo on Nikon D7000

Example photo on Nikon D7000

10. The camera can shoot video with a maximum quality of Full HD 1,920 X 1,080 (24p), while using a mono microphone (for stereo sound, you should buy a separate stereo microphone). The camera has automatic focus when shooting video, which they could not Nikon D90, D5000. The video is of sufficient quality (according to the reviews of my colleagues, I myself am not strong in video analysis). The maximum length of a video is 20 minutes. Of course, the camera has a Live View mode. In this mode, focusing is performed in contrast and is much slower in speed than normal focusing using the optical viewfinder and phase sensors. The Live View button is combined with the video recording button. In focus mode AF-C and with Live View turned on, the camera automatically monitors focus, even if the shutter button is not pressed.

Sample photo on Nikon D 7000

Sample photo on Nikon D 7000

11. The flash can work in command mode on system Nikon CLS. When using external flash units SB-600, SB-700, SB-800, SB-900, SB-910 (or from third-party manufacturers) quick synchronization with shutter speeds up to 1/8000 is possible, this is very important when photographing with flash at slow shutter speeds.

Photo on Nikon D7000

Photo on Nikon D7000

12. A bunch of pleasant things: the shutter withstands at least 150.000 operations, the camera has a gyroscope, the ability to shoot at intervals, alignment (adjustment) of precise focusing and many others.

Two memory card slots on the D7000

Two memory card slots on the D7000

Personal impressions:

The camera is very good. The camera menu is very large, it is not so easy to figure it out. In the review, I touched only on vital points for the photographer, if you need to find some trifle in the settings, then the instructions will help.

In many ways, the Nikon D7000 is one of the best DX-format cameras. When they ask me which advanced camera I recommend, then Nikon D7000 is the best option.if the issue price does not play a role. In my hands, in my opinion, the camera looks more like Nikon D90than on Nikon D300s. Image quality: at a high level, however, you can only talk about matrix noise, color reproduction, etc., since the image itself forms the lens and at low distinguish one camera from another. Some of my colleagues video operators shoot video on the Nikon D7000, and it is for the sake of video that they take this camera. Also, very often the Nikon D7000 is very popular as a second camera with professional photographers.

Example photo on Nikon D7000

Example photo on Nikon D7000

Comparison with other, similar in functionality, cameras from Nikon

Nikon D90 VS Nikon D7000

The Nikon D7000 has a step higher ISO, and two steps higher maximum (extended) ISO. 4MP added. The viewfinder covers 100%. Support for manual lenses has been added, autofocus has appeared when shooting video, video quality has reached Full HD, and the shooting speed has increased by 1.5 fps. Another slot for memory cards has been added; the Nikon D7000 can use more capacious ones SD XC cards. The number of focus points has increased, exposure metering has improved, and a virtual horizon has been added. All in all, D7000 all better for the Nikon D90. Ergonomics and overall functionality are very similar. I do not recommend changing Nikon D90 to D7000.

Nikon D7000 VS Nikon D300, D300s

The D7000 beats the D300s at 6 fps in 14-bit RAW mode versus 2.5 fps in 14-bit RAW mode on the D300s. Also, the D7000 has 1 stop higher ISO sensitivity, better video with autofocus. But the D300s has a more robust body, more focus points (51 versus 39), support CF memory cards, higher burst speed, larger buffer and professional ergonomics. Nikon D300 performance is better for Nikon D7000. I do not recommend changing D300, D300s to Nikon D7000, and vice versa, D7000 to D300s.

Nikon D7000 has a younger brother, the continuation of the line - Nikon D7100.

Sample photo on Nikon D7000

Sample photo on Nikon D7000

In general, a review about Nikon D7000 can be written endlessly, the camera is simply full of different functions and settings. There are few photos in this review, since while I was testing and delving into the settings, the battery ran out and the charging was not given to me. Please note that the quality of photos depends very much on the lens and other important things when shooting.

Sample photo on Nikon D7000

Sample photo on Nikon D7000

The parameters shown in the photo gallery:
All shot with Nikon D7000. On-camera JPEG L. Everything was shot in NL picture control mode: contrast correction - 0, brightness - 0, saturation - 0, hue - 0, sharpness - position 9 between 0 and 9. Used white balance: 'Auto', 'Shadow' and 'Cloudy'. The size of the photos was reduced to 3 MP. All shot using a lens Nikon Nikkor AF-S 35mm 1: 1.8G DX.

Prices for modern Nikon cameras in popular stores can look at this link.

Comments on this post do not require registration. Anyone can leave a comment. Many different photographic equipment can be found on AliExpress.


Conclusions:

Nikon D7000 is a great advanced amateur camera. Many indicators excel in the quality of the camera of a professional line. Nikon D7000 will be useful for both amateur and professional. I recommend.

Material prepared Arkady Shapoval. Training/Consultations | Youtube | Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | Telegram

Add a comment: Osh

 

 

Comments: 1 644, on the topic: Nikon D7000 review

  • Sergei

    19 000 SET + BONUS - USB FLASH DRIVE AND NEPIN WIDE BELT FROM NIKON !!! LIES WITHOUT BUSINESS - WELL AND MONEY NEEDED!
    kazsad2008@yandex.ru

    • Galina

      Where are you?

  • SERGEI

    KIT SOLD

  • Maksim

    Greetings to the respected community, people please spend an educational program. Why do you need so many flash sync speeds?

    • Igor S.

      I believe that there are different flashes that need different shutter speeds. It can be portable, generator and studio.

  • Sergei

    Hello Arkady! Please tell me the price / quality for Nikon D7000 universal AF lens (for screwdriver autofocus). Thanks in advance.

  • Andrei

    I was presented with a D7000 with an 18-105 lens for my birthday.
    Prior to this, I used the Canon PowerShot A720 IS.
    So my little Canon with a tiny “non-detachable” lens is probably 4 times closer than the huge D7000 with a lens larger than the entire Canon.
    How so ???
    Maybe in the settings of the D7000 you need to change something, turn on digital zoom or something else ???

    • anonym

      If you ask such questions, then the best way would be to sell this camera and buy some kind of ultra zoom like Nikon P500 or something like that. And the D7000 is a camera for people who understand what to do with it.

    • Vakhtang

      I am very sorry for your donated camera.

    • D7000

      I'm in the house)))))

  • Karabas-Barabas

    Andrey, the 7000 is far from huge, and the difference in zooming is due to the size of the matrix. On the long end of any soap dish it simply does not exist, as in other things and on the wide one.

  • Karabas-Barabas

    I absolutely agree with the main conclusion of the article - an excellent advanced amateur camera.
    The main disadvantages come from the disgusting matrix. Noisy at high ISO, above 800 it is impossible to shoot highly detailed objects, while fighting against noise, all the details are eaten. Neither optics nor optics save 2.8. The second minus disgusting colors in low light. To be treated in photo editors, but for a long time and hard, plus you need a high-quality ips monitor.
    Pros - high-speed performance, tenacious autofocus, long-lasting battery, moisture resistance.

    • Vitaliy U

      7000y can be blamed for anything, but not as a smoky matrix. The same matrices, Sony firms, now put on ALL modern crop (the difference in the number of mp.). In 7000, with its 16 mp. you can still normally wipe off hands without lubrication. At 24-36mp. it will be problematic already. And optics for larger matrices need a top-end one. So the d7000 is perhaps the last of the Mohicans.

    • Anatoly Snezhan, the city of Gomel.

      With the conclusion entirely, I agree. Not so hot a camera, and even for TA-A-A-KIE bobosiki.
      Color rendering, even with a semi-sunny daytime sky, with normal, relatively normal glass, illumination does not please the heart, or even the eye. Sad but true. Not happy (and 60% percent generally useless) functionality. Buttons, levers, items in the menu - more than enough, all over all the forces, and ... a good half is not needed at all, tk. with no real benefit.
      I will dwell only on the diopter wheel - the existing "correction of vision" is poor, even idiotic. Many young myopic, farsighted and old people with their astigmatism do not need such a frail correction. Well, okay, albeit new, but with a shoulder of +3,5 - -3,5 diopters.
      And yet, since the cameras have been acquired, we will comprehend. Still, the D7000 is no worse than the Zorkikh, FEDs, Kievs and so on. Whisk on good optics!

  • Vitaliy U

    typo: CMOS matrices, of course.

  • Nichiporenko-Zagogulya

    Arkady, I would like a more detailed review of the D7000, especially in terms of settings, modes, selection and setting of white balance. This review of yours is superficial, designed for long-standing digital users, but what about beginners?

    • Igor S.

      Everything that you asked for has long been written in the instructions in the camera.

      • Taras Shershnelyub-Moskalenko

        Hehe, he is the wisest?! And not a fig is written there - because it was written by the same muzzling, narrow-eyed and narrow-minded.

  • Nichiporenko-Zagogulya

    Moreover, the topic remains unsolved, although the camera is almost five years old from birth.

  • anonym

    Good afternoon, thanks for the cool site! I would like to ask someone used a 7000GB card in the D64, which manufacturer, what are your impressions?

  • Maksim

    Hello! Please tell me, I want to take Nikon d7000, is there any point in taking from 18-105 and buy Nikon 70-300mm f / 4.5-5.6G ED-IF AF-S VR or is it better to take a carcass with Nikon 18-300mm f / 3.5-5.6G ED AF-S VR DX? The price is almost the same.

    • Michael

      70-300 is a good choice, 18-300 is some kind of compromise, i.e. either at a wide angle it will smear godlessly, or at the far end. In general, I recommend either keeping the standard lens, or buying a body and buying something more impressive (17-55 f / 2,8 DX for example) and 70-300. Taking into account the crop factor, it will be the same portrait with elements of a “lens for wildlife” (140-450 mm for a full frame), if in approximate values ​​- optical zoom - up to 12,6 times. It is enough to read “RUS” on the license plate from 150 m.

    • Anatoly Snezhan, the city of Gomel.

      ... So exactly a year has passed since your question. Did you understand the answer to your question or ask in a year?

  • Andrei

    Good afternoon, Arkady, tell me, can I adjust the central button of the joystick to 7000% crop in the D100? Thanks!

    • Arkady Shapoval

      It is impossible ((

  • Andrei

    Sadness ((

  • Andrei

    hello Arkady, an interesting question, is there somewhere infa about how much maximum load the bayonet mount of Nikon cameras (different models) can withstand? In particular, I am interested in whether my D 7000 Tair 3 FS will withstand if it is not supported by hand?

  • R'RёS,R ° F "RёR№

    Hello everyone! Help, it’s worth choosing which model to take on the d5200 / 5300 or d7000 body. Doubts about the d7000 are related to the fact that this is the 2010 model, and the technology goes forward, although the classics are eternal, and I don’t need 24 MP principle at all, why overpay for them!
    in 5200/5300 there is a matrix as well as on 7100 - although MP is not the main thing !!!
    but at the same time the focusing module in the 5200 is the same as on the 7000 - Multi-CAM 4800DX
    So I'm "suffering")))
    the 5300 lacks an AA filter (I still do not understand if this is bad or good for an amateur!)
    d7100 do not consider because a little expensive!
    I plan to not change the carcass for about 5 years, spend money only on lenses.
    First of all I will take pictures of portraits, then landscapes, sporting events (running, football match at the stadium from the stands) ...
    I will be grateful for the motivated answers!
    Have a nice day, everyone!

    • Lynx

      Take 7000. Opportunities are more, and more flexible. 7100 is certainly better, but not critical.

    • Vitaliy U

      I agree with the Lynx (I use 7000 myself). Ergonomics (except for the rotary screen) in the 7000 is much better in comparison with the 5200-5300. Megapixels on crop is from the evil one :))). D7000 + 80-200 f2 / 8 + 35 f 1/8 + 12-24 f4 + sb700 and you will be happy!

      • Alexander

        "Megapixels on the crop are from the evil one :)))" - class !!!))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

        • Vitaliy U

          As I understand it, they kind of commented on it with sarcasm ... No problem. Take a camera with 24MP + top glass (MANDATORY) + tripod + cable (remote control). And with "songs"!

  • Eugene

    Hello to everyone who is still upset, the d7000-in good hands, beats the picture on a tumble, from 18-105 they even compared it with the entire line of amateur (nikon, canon) filmed an event in a choir, more than a dozen DSLRs were involved.
    Then laying out the pictures in the social. Networks, the most popular and vaunted were pictures of the old d7000 ..
    Canon Mark III, why did it look like a “soapbox” in terms of picture quality .. ??? ..,
    The main thing is that after 3100, 5200- d7000 frames with a correct exposure do not have to be processed, except for artistic requests ... It saves time and brains ...

    • The Hedgehog

      a very dubious comparison, everyone shoots in their own way, with their own glasses, their settings and their own frame composition, and comparing cameras based on reviews about photos in social networks is not an option :-))

    • Cergy

      Did the third Mark look like a soap box? It is even suspicious and seeks to reduce everything you have written to nothing. In the third brand is one of the best matrices for DSLRs today. At 12800, the flight is normal in color, not to mention the bw. With 7000 you will never achieve such a result.

    • anonym

      +100500

    • Alexander

      You killed me. It turns out that if I don't have a D7000, then my pictures will always be worse on social networks. I would like to see your pictures ...

  • Ivan

    the matrix is ​​the same as in Sony Nex, but the Nex in the secondary market is worth a penny and the working length allows you to fasten absolutely any lens through the adapter, even a rangefinder, at least Canon FD without any files and alterations)))

  • Paul

    And why do not you recommend changing the D90 to the D7000, although judging by the D7000 article, in many ways it is better? I have on the D90, I began to jumble the shutter, or it works with a delay, or even after the 2nd or 3rd press.

  • Stanislas

    Good day!) I noticed dust or dirt on the camera sensor on closed apertures when the photo was enlarged, took a couple of test pictures and determined that it was “dirty”, no matter how critical, but still, not very much, remove stains in Photoshop In the photo! Tell me, did someone clean the sensor on their own? There is a lot of material on the Internet about this, but still, maybe someone's hands did not tremble, share your experience! I don’t want to hand over for repairs, there are reasons, I don’t trust them.

    • Arkady Shapoval

      https://radojuva.com.ua/2012/05/sensor-cleaning-about/

      • Elvira

        Hello! I shoot reports on ballroom dancing on an old D60 with a whale lens; in the summer I plan to start filming staged photo sessions. Of course, this cannot be done with my "miracle") There is such a variant of the used Nikon D7000 body. Excellent condition. A complete set, a box, a charger, etc., a portrait lens NIKON AF 50 mm f / 1.8 D + filter, TAMRON AF 28-200mm f / 3.8-5.6 ASPHERICAL IF + hood and a protective filter. Do you think it's worth taking? The new 7000 with a stackable high-aperture lens will take much more ...

    • Alexander

      I would not recommend you to clean the matrix yourself. 90% of this will be done incorrectly, in poor conditions and without the necessary equipment. Almost 100% that you will leave micro-scratches on the matrix. For these purposes you need a microscope, a "clean room", special fluids / mops, and firm hands.

    • anonym

      Find on ebey kits for cleaning matrices from "delkin device", they even have a vacuum cleaner, mops, liquid for cleaning matrices. The seller also put in a matrix cleaning pencil for me as a bonus. There are other manufacturers as well. As I recently learned, isopropyl alcohol and dist. water, but I don't know the exact proportion, I think 80%. Yes, I have q7000 and he seems to have the same disease as q600. I cleaned it myself and more than once. The shutter stopped spitting somewhere after 15000 actuations, but the old spit dry up, shuffled with mops. as in over the deck. Carry out the scrubbing in a clean room, having done a wet cleaning and have someone keep a vacuum cleaner (household) next to the camera. The battery must be fully charged, I had enough for three cleaning procedures from one battery. Something like this. I wish you success.

  • Dmitriy

    I am the happy owner of this camera.
    Please tell me good manual macro lenses (from old).

    Thanks in advance

    • Vitaliy U

      I am using Nikkor 55 2.8 (Arcadia has a review here). Very satisfied! Razor-sharp. In the open, you can also portray portraits (especially for men). I recommend.

    • Maksim

      Jupiter-37A, Kaleinar-5N, Helios-81n. Scoop but quite decent, from native optics there are many sensible glasses, but the price tag on them is not always humane.

  • Igor

    For macro, from Soviet lenses, Industar I-61L / D 2.8 / 53mm showed itself very well. Besides the cheapest. Used on Nikon D5100 with an adapter and macro rings.

  • Elvira

    Hello! I shoot reports on ballroom dancing on an old D60 with a whale lens, in the summer I plan to start shooting also production photoshoots. Of course this cannot be done with my “miracle”) There is such an option for the used Nikon D7000 body. The condition is excellent. A complete set, box, charging, etc. in addition to the lenses, the NIKON AF 50 mm f / 1.8 D + portrait filter, TAMRON AF 28-200mm f / 3.8-5.6 ASPHERICAL IF + lens hood and a protective filter. Think worth taking? The new 7000 with the same high-aperture lens will take much more ...

    • Elvira

      and I would also like to clarify that the shutter ran off 150 and it was replaced with a new one, with a mileage of about 000 ... I haven't come across this, I would like to hear your opinion ...

      • Elvira

        and, and, for all this set the price is 28 000 :)

        • Elvira

          a, and a SLR a little over a year :)

          • Anatoly Snezhan, Gomel

            It is very difficult to answer such questions in absentia. I'll say one thing for sure. If the camera has already replaced the shutter assembly (and what exactly?), And even this happened within a year, then the first owner exhausted the technique fiercely. Quite like eagle-hack-workers on covens. This comes out ... uh-uh ... 400-430 frames daily, seven days a week! Logically speaking, other, more expensive components, for example, a mirror +, a bayonet +, a motor +, can actually get worn out in the camera, and so on. So, Elvira, my honest verdict: do not get excited, let him use his healed (who else healed and how he cured?) Fotik himself. Moreover, there is nothing dear and valuable in the "dowry" - she was so-so, even three-point. 28 thousand is a jump in dollars for today - I don’t understand ... If it’s about 500 bucks, then I would definitely, without fuss, pick up and buy myself a new D7000. And then optics. By the way, you need a Nikkor 35 / 1,8 camera for your reports in the ballroom. And a flash (try to take your own!) Like 400 (but it would be better to 500 and above - 700 ...).
            Lenses like 50-80 mm will be taken later, if necessary. He is already getting cheaper.

          • The Hedgehog

            Is this really the only option that you have looked for yourself? :-)) Look for a separate camera, a separate glass, which you choose yourself, bargain, offers darkness.

    • Dmitriy

      Do not take it. My mileage is about 170. It is cleaned about once a month. I'm already looking for a replacement camera. And more than 000 with glasses to sell conscience will not allow :)

  • Anatoly Snezhan, Gomel

    Like version. If you urgently need such a camera, then take it with optics, but at half price, 12-15 thousand.

  • Vladislav

    Hello. I have such a problem with the Nikon d7000 camera. When you press the shutter button, autofocus occurs. Then, as if one click, when you press the second one and after a few seconds, it happens even after 30 seconds. Well, the photo turns out blurry. There wasn’t such before. You press the shutter and immediately the photo turns out to be excellent. I take a picture in mode A. I set the shutter speed to 1,8 and 5,6 or more. It’s all the same with a long delay. This is a malfunction or you need to configure the camera. It seems to be set up completely confused. Previously, fast and excellent photographed, decided white balance AF-S Nikorr 35 mm 1: 1,8 G lens
    Sincerely. Yes, when I shoot with a flash, then with a little delay, and when on the machine. Then everything is fine almost.

    • The Hedgehog

      Quote: I am photographing in A. mode; I set the shutter speed to 1,8 and 5,6 or more
      _______________________________
      learn the materiel, then you will know why the aperture priority turns out to be a long video delay and what to do with it ... maybe you, plus everything, when adjusting the white balance, set the exposure compensation to “plus” ...? And then they closed the diaphragm and went off to photograph a black cat in a dark room?

Add a comment

Copyright © Radojuva.com. Blog author - Photographer in Kiev Arkady Shapoval. 2009-2023

English-version of this article https://radojuva.com/en/2012/05/obzor-nikon-d7000/comment-page-21/?replytocom=261819

Versión en español de este artículo https://radojuva.com/es/2012/05/obzor-nikon-d7000/comment-page-21/?replytocom=261819