answers: 235

  1. Mitya
    14.06.2020

    4

    Reply

  2. Mitya
    14.06.2020

    5

    Reply

  3. Mitya
    14.06.2020

    6

    Reply

  4. Mitya
    14.06.2020

    7

    Reply

  5. Mitya
    14.06.2020

    8

    Reply

  6. Mitya
    14.06.2020

    9

    Reply

  7. Mitya
    14.06.2020

    10

    Reply

  8. Mitya
    14.06.2020

    I shot everything on a Canon 5D classic

    Reply

  9. Alexander
    01.07.2020

    I bought myself such a lens on the D700, installed an adapter with a lens, the photo shows a faint spot in the center, which changes its size depending on the aperture, a small spot on a closed spot, a large spot on an open one. What can it be and where does it come from?

    Reply

    • Alexander
      07.07.2020

      I come to the conclusion that these apertureless blades of the diaphragm give such a glare, it’s a pity, I liked the lens as a whole, only this fifth periodically spoils everything

      Reply

      • Fedor
        11.06.2021

        Just put it on the ff bzk and everything will be fine, but nikon is not about manual glasses with a working distance of 45.5

        Reply

      • B. R. P.
        11.06.2021

        Yes, ff bzk is our fsio. It even removes stains.

        Reply

      • Wayfarer
        26.12.2022

        So here the stain is clearly from the additional lens on the adapter. So yes, the FF BZ will get rid of spots, as well as the Canon CZK, in view of the fact that there the working distance allows you to install M42 optics without any additional lenses.
        In general, you should study the issue before trying to be clever.
        In principle, FF is not necessary, both crop and micro are possible, only on FF the lens will open completely.

        Reply

      • B. R. P.
        26.12.2022

        So smart as you, I can’t learn how much you don’t study the issue. Such characters fascinate me. From the height of their professionalism, they teach strangers on the Internet, while not knowing the rules of etiquette and simple folk wisdom, for example, “a fool loves to teach, and a smart one learns.” You do not know how familiar this issue is to me, maybe you have something to learn. And in any case, no one can dictate to anyone what to write in comments on the Internet. I believe that if there is no mood and you want to pour out your bile on someone, then a reasonable person will refrain, or at least try to choose expressions.

        Reply

    • ba3lur
      16.12.2023

      ... most likely the problem is in the adapter with the lens, or rather its quality... it’s easy to check by installing a simple m42-nikon adapter... it’s clear that focusing will be up to 3-4m

      Reply

  10. Bogdan
    29.09.2020

    SONY a550
    I like this. The pictures are somehow interesting. Although, I'm at the user level only. I dug up an object in the attic)

    Reply

    • Bogdan
      29.09.2020

      3

      Reply

  11. Bogdan
    29.09.2020

    SONY a550
    2

    Reply

  12. Anatoly
    12.11.2020

    I don’t know what the topic was, but do you think about Zenitar and radioactivity? On your dumka ob'єktiv shkіdliviy chi nі?

    Reply

    • Rodion
      12.11.2020

      Nobody used ThO2 in the lenses of this Zenitar. Too luxurious for the USSR. Asahi da Zeiss allowed themselves such a thing.

      Reply

      • Anatoly
        12.11.2020

        Dyakuyu, have been reassured. And then I'm already thinking pozbuvatisya my love.

        Reply

  13. Ghosh
    03.09.2021

    Cool glass

    Reply

  14. Ghosh
    03.09.2021

    1

    Reply

  15. https://reklama-kiev.net
    09.07.2022

    once I had such a thing

    Reply

  16. Swiat
    05.08.2022

    The people, I need advice about this glass. Bought, listed for installation on the 600D, but the joy did not last long. Beautiful drawing, interesting “airy” bokeh - all this lasted a couple of days, and the shutter waved the handle (err2). It will sound strange, but there was a first fiver to replace it (EOS 5D Mark l, aka Classic). Having installed the Zenithar there, all I saw was a terrible soapy picture. Is it generally suitable for a full-frame carcass, or look for something better?

    Reply

    • B. R. P.
      06.08.2022

      It was released for Zenith, and this is a full-frame carcass) Look for problems in the camera or in a specific lens / adapter.

      Reply

    • R'RёS,R ° F "RёR№
      26.01.2024

      The D600 is still cropped and it takes away the central part of the lens. At an open aperture, as a rule, only the center is sharp. So it turns out that if you set it to full frame, you get a sluggish picture. On film it is, after all, tolerable, but a full 24MP matrix claims to be something of better quality.

      Reply

  17. Wladimir
    23.11.2022

    Has anyone used this lens for IR photography? If possible, a few words on this topic.

    Reply

    • Rodion
      24.11.2022

      What range do you want to shoot?

      Reply

      • Wladimir
        24.11.2022

        The camera, unfortunately, is not modified to shoot in the infrared spectrum, but the range is 760.
        Thank you for responding.

        Reply

      • Rodion
        24.11.2022

        Lenses usually correct up to 650 nm, the extra 100 nm in red do not make the weather. So feel free to use it. Transmission in this range is usually good enough for glass.

        Reply

      • Wladimir
        12.12.2022

        If possible, one more question: compared to the Zenitar 50 / 1,7, is the Nikon 50 mm 1.8D AF lens for IR shooting? I mean sharpness, and hence the detail. Or is the difference only in the price of 5-6 thousand rubles for a used one? Thank you.

        Reply

      • Alexey
        24.11.2022

        Apparently, this means the use of an IR filter from 760 to the sensitivity limit of the matrix (about 1000 nm). With sharpness, it will most likely be good, but there will be glare and re-reflections, because. illumination will not work. There may be a slightly darker spot (hotspot) in the center of the frame. If the camera is not modified, then the main problem is the need for long exposures.

        Reply

      • Alexey
        24.11.2022

        Glare example. The camera has been modified.

        Reply

      • Wladimir
        25.11.2022

        Tell me, in your example, was there a hood on the lens. And if the camera were tilted down a little so that the sun would not shine so much, would these glare be avoided? Or would that not solve the problem?

        Reply

      • B. R. P.
        25.11.2022

        There was clearly no hood.

        Reply

      • Alexey
        25.11.2022

        Yes, there was no hood. Glare appears if the sun is almost in the frame, otherwise they are not a problem, but rather an artistic feature. And in general, there is no need to look for some special lens.

        Reply

      • Rodion
        25.11.2022

        Ah, well then, yes. Everything is written correctly. Of course, it is best to take optics from night vision devices such as 50 / 1.5 TVNO-2B or 50 / 1.2 TVNE-4B lenses. An excellent option (but only for IR, without a visible area) is Helios-50 100 / 1.5 from TKN-1S. All these lenses are coated and corrected for the IR region.

        Reply

      • Wladimir
        12.12.2022

        If possible, one more question: compared to the Zenitar 50 / 1,7, is the Nikon 50 mm 1.8D AF lens for IR shooting? I mean sharpness, and hence the detail. Or is the difference only in the price of 5-6 thousand rubles for a used one? Thank you.

        Reply

      • Rodion
        12.12.2022

        Lenses are about the same level in terms of optical quality. I highly doubt there will be any significant difference.

        Reply

  18. Michael
    15.05.2023

    good lens, I inherited it from my grandmother

    Reply

  19. Load more comments ...

Reply

 

 

Top
mobility. computer