answers: 299

  1. Dmitry VK
    03.08.2015

    I don’t understand if the manual nikon 70-210 MF f / 4 exists or is it a mistake in the description. Tell me if anyone knows

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      03.08.2015

      In what description? There is a manual Nikon Lens Series E Zoom 70-210mm 1: 4

      Reply

  2. Dmitry VK
    03.08.2015

    Arkady, I’m sorry that I didn’t write clearly. Offer and description on Avito. I’m already used to getting all the reliable information from your site)) it’s probably him, Nikon Lens Series E Zoom 70-210mm 1: 4 didn’t come across such a nikon in your hands?

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      03.08.2015

      Until I came across.

      Reply

  3. Dmitriy
    04.08.2015

    There is an opportunity to take Nikon 70-210 f4 for normal money, but I doubt the nikon d90 will it be too narrow, maybe there is something more suitable for crop?

    Reply

  4. Dmitriy
    04.08.2015

    Arkady, thanks. And Nikon 70-210 f4 on the D90 showed itself?

    Reply

  5. Dmitriy
    04.08.2015

    Old. bored. Igor thanks, advise - is it worth taking?

    Reply

    • Star boring. Igor
      04.08.2015

      If we are talking about the one that is in this review and it is in good condition, then it’s worth it, I’ll note on my own that he brought me so much joy that I bought a D200 specially for it and then began to grow overglass, etc., and at the end the end is already time to sell, tk. under 80-200 2,8 (or 70-200 bp) it is necessary to free up space, but the hand does not rise, I come up with excuses like “well, maybe use it in bad weather”, etc…. The only thing that needs to be understood is that he is more of a portrait than a telephoto, i.e. if you are interested in distant objects, sharpness, then I think you will take it for a similar price https://radojuva.com.ua/2014/04/nikon-af-70-300-mm-4-5-6g/

      Reply

  6. Andrei
    08.11.2015

    Tell me please ,
    and will the E-series lens be much inferior?

    Reply

  7. Yang
    25.11.2015

    Took 70-210 from a friend! Very dark lens! Explain people to a fool: why when I set aperture 17 on my Sigma 50-4 and compare it with 70-210 on the same aperture, the picture on Sigma turns out to be much lighter (about 1,5-2 stops) ??? Just do not need to write in style - set the shutter speed longer or raise the ISO)))

    Reply

    • Sergey
      25.11.2015

      Because in the OVI you are ALWAYS aiming with the aperture open, and for Sigma 17-50 is 2,8.
      The Sigma diaphragm is clamped to 4 only at the moment the shutter is released.

      Reply

    • Peter Sh.
      26.11.2015

      Because the density of light rays (brightness) does not change with decreasing hole diameter.
      In dark glass, brightness is just less.
      Therefore, the true optical aperture is not measured by the geometric size of the aperture.

      Reply

    • Mad
      30.11.2015

      you compare different focal) what can not be done

      Reply

  8. Alexey
    18.01.2016

    Hello.
    I’m thinking about buying the one described in Article 70-210, while there are already 55-300 1: 4.5-5.6G VR. I want to use as a portrait. Will there be a noticeable difference in aperture, etc.?

    Reply

    • brighty
      18.01.2016

      In the aperture, of course there will be a difference, this lens is significantly lighter, the f4 starts at 70mm, and for the 55-300 4.5 with 55mm. But it's not that. These are completely different glasses. 55-300 is a very good lens in terms of optical performance, unfortunately it rotates the front lens when focusing, it’s hemorrhagic to use a polarizing filter. Some still don't like the speed of focusing, but it's a matter of habit. And 70-210 has all these disadvantages, but does not have a stabilizer (of course). And depending on the camera, the result will be different, for example, at 7100 it is soft and slightly loses by 55-300 in color, it is dirtier or something. But if you shoot in RAW and make friends with Photoshop, then no problem.
      In short, if there is no other portraiture, then 70-210 is very good.

      Reply

  9. Viktorych
    01.03.2016

    They wrote a lot here, both good and bad, I’ll say a few words:

    Advantages:
    - completely indestructible construct - glass, metal and a little plastic, and a couple of gears.
    - a nice picture of the blur of the backdrop, I did not compare it with the 55-300 and 70-300, but with the kit 18-105 on comparable focal lengths and apertures, no comparison
    - Acceptable sharpness, as for the ancient zoom, and who said that the 7100 matrix is ​​not for it?
    Here is a frame for example with 7100 + 70-210, the aperture is slightly covered up to 6.3.
    https://img-fotki.yandex.ru/get/64973/80897468.18/0_12c994_39e54f4_orig

    Disadvantages:
    - the copy may suffer from a focus shift depending on the focusing distance, at least for me that is. On MDF, the focus correction is +15, on ~ 50m - already to zero.
    - the front lens rotates during focusing, on the one hand it is a drawback, on the other - a design feature. At least it is good that the size does not change when the focal length is changed.
    - the most significant drawback - if it encounters objects with contrasting lighting in the background - mascara light :) Chromats are just the sea. It is worth choosing the background carefully.

    The fact that it is relatively dark, without a motor and without a stub is not a drawback, everything is stated in technical specifications, who needs something else - 70-200 VR.

    Reply

  10. juliana
    26.08.2016

    Hello. I understand that this lens will focus automatically on my d7100 camera. What about the vivitar 28-105 f / 2.8-3.8 lens? I look forward to hearing. Thank you for your articles, very useful information.

    Reply

    • Igor_K
      29.10.2016

      If the full name is “Vivitar Series 1 28-105mm 1: 2.8-3.8 MC Auto Focus Zoom JAPAN Ø72mm”, then it will focus, and quite quickly.

      Reply

  11. Victor
    26.08.2016

    He is manual, this is your Vivitar.

    Reply

  12. Dmitriy
    14.09.2016

    Is there a variation in quality depending on the instance of this lens? And does it make sense to change to 80-200 / 2.8 if you do not take into account the aperture, and only compare the sharpness of both at aperture 4?

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      14.09.2016

      80-200 at F / 4 gives a much better result than 70-210 at fully open.

      Reply

  13. Alexander
    11.10.2016

    What about this one? Nikon 70-180mm f / 4.5-5.6D ED Micro-Nikkor

    Reply

  14. Artem
    22.12.2016

    Hello Arkady! Sat down on your once and I can not get down, very sensible! Thanks!
    And I have a question ... Impressed by your review Nikon 28-105 bought it. I like it for his specific Nikon picture, which, as I understand it now, has always attracted me. There was a Sigma 17-50 before - a very decent lens, but the picture is not at all the same. And now I want to take a telephoto. I immediately wanted a Nikon 80-200 2.8 MKII, but somehow there was not enough money and at the moment there are no offers. Drew attention (also from your review) to the Nikon 70-210 f4. As I understood for myself - a lens from that era and with the same character as my 28-105. Those. great picture. But I was also very interested in the good offer for the Nikon 70-300 4.5-5.6 VR. On the side of the first one, the picture and the quality of the body, constant aperture are visible. On the side of the second 300 at the second end, a stabilizer. Now I think ... I myself am an amateur. I shoot relatives, friends, nature, crop events, everything. Soon I want to get a full frame. The 70-300 is subjectively more attractive in terms of reviews, but for some reason it seems to me that this 70-210 is much more professional than chtoli, for growth. And this 70-300 is a plastic slag. Or I'm wrong? I would be grateful for your answer.

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      23.12.2016

      Portrait - 70-210, everything else - 70-300

      Reply

      • Jury
        12.12.2017

        Hello. I am not a pro either, but there has always been interest in photography, and the “viewers” ​​like my work. There was a long break, but I constantly wanted to return. I came back and the first thing I did was read a lot of Arcadia's reviews. I used to have exclusively Pentax, but decided to switch to Nikon. I like the structure of the reviews, their form. For myself, I find it useful that when it becomes necessary to return to the review, I know exactly where the information I am interested in is.
        I can tell Artem that I have both of these lenses (VR 70-300 and 70-210 f4). I bought the first one to work at the stadium (my son plays football, I’m catching the moment until he grows up :)), and the second one from this review, taking Arkady's word for it. I ordered it in Japan, it came in a new state. And as Arkady tells you, I use it for portraits. The lens is gorgeous! Take it - you won't regret it. Just choose carefully, because age makes itself felt, and many specimens are susceptible to mold and mildew. Everyone, without exception, has dust inside, but there are instances, we can say without it. If you are thinking of buying, I recommend it from Japan, or where you live, to pick up.

        Reply

  15. Alexander
    24.05.2017

    I rent weddings, portraits of a good lens. Not enough aperture, and freezing in bright light. Drawing is just class.

    Reply

  16. Alexander
    24.05.2017

    This is on focal 210

    Reply

  17. Alexander
    21.06.2017

    Good afternoon. Please advise the “Blend” model which is best suited for this glass. Thanks for attention

    Reply

    • Alexey
      28.06.2017

      HN-24. Full on ebee (from 3 to 15s)

      Reply

  18. Lexaovo
    07.07.2017

    Good afternoon, thanks to Arkady for the review and Alexey from the last comment)) for the hood model! Bought today as my second camera D80 at a very reasonable price (one hundred bucks), the seller (amateur photographer - kakonist) strongly recommended that I buy this telephoto with him. Bargained for 50 bucks. Although I already have enough telephoto cameras, I took it at this price and I'm very happy. This one is better than Nikkor 75-240 mm 4.5-5.6 at least because of the aperture and does not wash.

    Reply

  19. Konstantin
    10.09.2017

    Colleagues, tell me, please, how to remove the front lens unit for cleaning this lens? I unscrewed the bolt on the focusing ring (with a slot), but when rotating counterclockwise, the block cannot be removed, it is firmly in the focusing cylinder. No more fasteners are not watching. Rotate counterclockwise or did the Japanese come up with something else here? The manual cannot be found on the network.
    Thank you in advance for your help.

    Reply

    • Alexey
      09.11.2017

      The front lens unit is twisted counterclockwise; no bolt needs to be unscrewed.

      Reply

  20. Koba
    15.01.2018

    Speaking of compactness and generally in reviews, it would probably be better to add the lens sizes in the specifications table. So, the length of this lens is 156mm, and the diameter is 76mm, which is really not enough for a free lens, especially with internal focusing and zooming.

    Reply

    • Victor
      18.01.2018

      So focusing is not internal, unlike zooming.

      Reply

  21. Anatoly
    09.02.2018

    Does anyone have experience using this lens with a 1.4x teleconverter?

    Reply

  22. Konstantin
    29.05.2018

    Well, finally I managed to unscrew it. Comrades - share my joy with me. Mold stains removed. The lens is now in perfect condition.
    I use it on the set of theatrical productions, where he copes with one hundred percent. Thanks for helping Alexey. Photos helped a lot.

    Reply

    • Basil
      30.05.2018

      Congratulations)))) Good luck

      Reply

    • Alexey
      30.05.2018

      Excellent, happy for you!

      Reply

    • B. R. P.
      30.05.2018

      Thank you for sharing your joy, Konstantin. Good shots!

      Reply

  23. Vadim
    30.07.2018

    Hello, Arkady. There is an af-nikor 70-300 1: 4-5,6G lens. Should I exchange it for the lens you described? All the lens is 30 years old. Thanks.

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      30.07.2018

      Not worth it

      Reply

  24. Vadim
    30.07.2018

    70-300 without VR, 70-210 sell for nearly 300 dollars. Adequate price?

    Reply

  25. anonym
    22.10.2018

    "Pivna Banka" 70-210 / 4 is not a Sony but a Minolta.

    Reply

  26. Load more comments ...

Reply

 

 

Top
mobility. computer