answers: 107

  1. Maksim
    28.12.2014

    Zabombil normally pictures! ++

    Reply

  2. Sergei
    28.05.2015

    Tell me, please, how sharp is it compared to the Nikon 70-300 / 4,5-5,6 VR on the same RF?

    Reply

    • Pastor
      28.05.2015

      Yes, by and large, almost as sharp. Closing up to an equal diaphragm with 70-300, maybe even a cut. But Jupiter also has f 4, which 70-300 does not have on any focal. A huge plus, in my opinion. On the other hand, Jupiter will only go when you know for sure that you need exactly 200mm, and from 70-300 you can report a lot.

      Reply

      • Sergei
        28.05.2015

        Understood thanks. I'm not for reportage. To shoot a reportage by a manual operator is cruel. Although at one time people filmed ...

        Reply

  3. Pacman
    15.01.2016

    I don’t know whether this refers to the shortcomings of Jupiter 21M or not, but you will still need to buy an adapter for a modern camera. Old lenses were screwed on the thread and did not have a lock. Therefore, take another 200-400 rubles from the budget and buy an M42 eos adapter if I don’t know for Canon, for Nikon another.

    Reply

  4. Alexander Hedgehog
    12.05.2016

    In general, for a long time I chased 21a, and then for a long time persuaded the seller to drop the price tag to an adequate $ 150, but the seller bent his own. In the end, I tried several 21m and was pleasantly surprised, only after trying it on I realized that deep down in my heart I was embarrassed about the first one, and it was, without exaggeration, an eagle's sharpness. I would say that u21 is an “adopted son”, or a hypertrophied twin brother of Tair 11a, they give out an equally perfect picture. Well, I'm back to 21 meters, it was the emka that retained that “Jupiter” softness and the characteristic Zonar pattern inherent in the entire line, while it is quite sharp with an open one. So, these are completely different lenses in essence, and ideally you can have both, the first will be with a reference sharpness and color rendering, the second with a characteristic pattern and softness.
    Photo from crop 2,0 at 21m

    Reply

  5. Timon
    17.10.2016

    Thanks for the review. If there is a choice, which is 200 mm preferable: Jupiter-21A or Tele-N? It is clear that the latter has a bayonet mount on Nikon, but in terms of pictures?

    Reply

    • KalekseyG
      17.10.2016

      Jupiter-21A has a replaceable shank, you can find and put on Nikon. But finding it (the lens) is difficult, the M version is easier to find, but you need to cut it.

      Reply

  6. Timon
    17.10.2016

    Still: Jupiter or Telear?

    Reply

    • KalekseyG
      17.10.2016

      Jupiter

      Reply

  7. Tamara
    06.12.2016

    Selling a new photographic lens in a package with a passport - "Jupiter-21M." 1996 release - Vologda Optical and Mechanical Plant. lotos63-63@mfil.ru

    Reply

  8. Alexander
    20.02.2017

    21A, ideally, for three hundred (and not a cent less) I can give, only in Ukraine, it produces a very tasty picture, ideal for full-frame Sonya with a sensor stub.
    https://vk.com/alexander_jozh

    Reply

    • anonym
      10.03.2017

      And then, Ostap suffered! ... :-)

      Reply

      • Alexander
        19.03.2017

        Well, it’s really cheaper to give it away, firstly it’s worth the result; secondly it’s very rare.

        Reply

  9. Chris ashurst
    19.03.2018

    I have an Jupiter 21A lens which needs reassembling - any instructions / manual / guide / diagrams would be helpful - or where can I get informations from

    Reply

  10. Oleg
    19.03.2018

    Hello!

    I dont know can I post links here ori cant, but you can check posts from “nesovet” livejournal. He repairs many kinds of lens and there is at least 3 posts about Jupiter-21;)
    Good luck

    Reply

    • Christopher ashurst
      05.04.2018

      Thanks Oleg

      Reply

  11. Vadim
    16.04.2018

    What are the advantages of such a lens over Helios 44-3? I don’t understand much, therefore the question is

    Reply

    • B. R. P.
      17.04.2018

      Well, for example: 200 mm of focal length versus 58. That is, you can take larger pictures of distant objects. Just not for everyone it's a holiday). You can also put Jupiter on Nikon while maintaining the tip to infinity using the adapter KP-A \ N, unlike Helios, etc., etc.

      Reply

  12. anonym
    27.07.2018

    Jupiter 21 M. Loves the light, then the picture will be beautiful.

    Reply

  13. Olena
    08.08.2018

    About * Active to get to the Nikona 5200?

    Reply

    • Michael
      08.08.2018

      Yes

      Reply

  14. Ilya
    08.10.2018

    I have a Sony a6500 UPC and Jupiter 21m, respectively, I need an M42-Nex adapter, I ordered a long adapter for Helios, but is it suitable for Jupiter? Because Jupiter is so long, but with an adapter on the bzk camera it will be something at all))

    Reply

    • anonym
      08.10.2018

      Yes. It will be something. But the telephoto will give an interesting picture.

      Reply

  15. Vadim
    29.04.2020

    Good day. Thank you for the article. I have Yu 37A. Question: who has the best picture, 37A or 21A?

    Reply

  16. Load more comments ...

Reply

 

 

Top
mobility. computer