Industar-50-2 and Industar-50-2 are one and the same lens with different spellings of the name. At the end of the review, in the supplement, the differences between lenses with different spellings of the name are indicated.
Industar 50-2 Lens Overview
TTX Industar-50-2 (Industar-50-2)
Focal length: 50 mm
Diaphragm: F3.5-F16
Number of aperture blades: 7 pieces
Thread: M42
The weight: 70gram
Optical design: 4 lenses in 3 groups (4-lens enlightened anastigmatis). The circuit is similar to Tessar lenses.
Filter Diameter: 35mm (there are also 33.5mm lenses)
Of course, after you see the lens in reality, it turns out that it is much smaller than it seems in the pictures. Industar-50-2 - very light and compact lens, I can’t even believe that in those far times they could make such small lenses. I even got the impression that Industar-50-2 pulled out of the camera of some sophisticated modern mobile smartphone.
Industar-50-2 on a modern digital camera
But its size doesn’t stop the Industar-50-2 from taking great pictures. Industar-50-2 is a medium aperture... Its maximum F-number is only F / 3.5. For comparison, an aperture of F / 3.5 is 3 times 'darker' beyond F / 2.0, which is available with a number of lenses, such as MS Helios-44m-7 2 / 58
Lens view Industar 50-2
General useful information about Industar-50-2:
- The lens is small. Industar-50-2 can always be taken with you. It fits comfortably in your pocket.
- Little weight. On a hike he will not create excess weight. And with such a tiny lens, any heavy SLR camera becomes an order of magnitude lighter than other lenses.
- Cheap. It is unlikely that one can now find a cheaper Soviet-era lens. You can not be afraid to damage it, lose it, get it dirty - which means you can always take it with you to the most extreme conditions. Buy Industar-50-2 can be approximately 10 cu
- Excellent sharpness. Sharpness allows you to use the lens starting at F3.5 aperture. The sharpness of the lens is due to its optical design. The circuit was copied from brand lenses Carl Zeiss Tessar... The Tessars are also referred to as the 'Eagle Eye' for their excellent resolution performance. By the way, you can read a review of such a Tessara - Carl Zeiss Jena DDR Tessar 2.8 / 50
- The lens has all the necessary indicators: distance, aperture, depth of field. Moreover, the aperture indicators are duplicated twice, which is rare.
- Due to the small size of the lens, it is quite difficult for him to find the front cover. If not, you can use the hollow (usually white) cover from the back lens of the lenses of modern Nikon, Canon lenses, etc.
Dual aperture scale. The lens has two rows of numbers for iris control.
Image quality:
The lens is almost completely fixed HA. Distortion is very small, not very different from other fifty dollars. Of course, aperture fails a little, but the Tessar scheme does not allow particularly fast lenses. A characteristic feature of Industar-50-2 is its ability to twist bokeh, this can be seen in the examples of photographs. What does it twist at the level of Helios-81n. The contrast of the lens is satisfactory. Backlight holds normally. In general, the picture on Industar-50-2 is pleasantly different for the better from the whale lenses that come with the new digital cameras.
View of the Industar-50-2 lens when focusing on MDF
Focus ring Industar-50-2 rotates approximately 320 degrees, which makes manual focusing very smooth and enjoyable. When focusing, the trunk of the lens lengthens by about one centimeter, while focusing front lens rotates. The depth of field scale is indicated for aperture values of F / 3.5, 4, 5.6, 8, 11, 16. Compared to other fifty dollars, Industar-50-2 a rather large depth of field at F / 3.5 (seen in the picture above).
Industar-50-2 with native ZENIT front cover
But the lens aperture control ring is quite inconvenient. It is located in front of the lens. To see what aperture value is set, you need flip the lens front lens to yourself. Iris control is smooth, without fixed values - you can set any intermediate value of the F number from 3.5 to 16.0. When focusing, the aperture control ring is very, very rarely touched. The lens aperture blades have 7 pieces, they create the usual 'nuts' in the out-of-focus area in bright light sources.
Industar-50-2 - rear view and aperture of the diaphragm
How to use with modern cameras?
Lenses with mounting thread M42 (M42 X 1 / 45.5), such as the lens from this review, are very easy to use on almost any modern digital camera (both SLR and mirrorless), for this it is enough to choose the right adapter (adapter). You do not need to carry out any additional steps to modify the lens.
The cheapest adapters can be found at Aliexpress.com... There are adapters (adapters) with a chip that provide more convenience during shooting, usually chips are used to confirm focus and / or metering exposure, and form the correct EXIF. The chip does not affect the image quality in any way.
For some SLR cameras (for example, with the Nikon F-mount), you need to use adapters with a corrective lens, which allows you to focus correctly at all focusing distances. For any mirrorless cameras, such a lens is not needed, and the adapter is a simple decorated hollow metal tube with an appropriate mount.
For SLR cameras
- Canon: For cameras Canon EOS with bayonet mount EF / EF-S need an M42-Canon EOS adapter, such an adapter with a chip can be found herewithout chip here.
- NIKON: For cameras Nikon DX / FXas well as for cameras Fujifilm и Kodak with a Nikon F mount, you need an M42-Nikon F adapter, you can buy such an adapter without a lens and a chip here, with a lens without a chip herewith chip without lens here, with lens and chip here. Why a lens? Why chip?
- PENTAX: For Pentax cameras with K mount, you need an M42-Pentax K adapter, you can buy such an adapter here.
- SONY/MINOLTA: For cameras with a Sony / Minolta A mount, you need the M42-Sony A adapter, you can find such an adapter without a chip at this linkwith a chip at this link.
- OLYMPUS/PANASONIC/LEICA: For cameras with a 4/3 bayonet mount (not to be confused with Micro 4/3!) You need an M42-4 / 3 adapter, you can buy such an adapter here.
For mirrorless cameras
- SONY: For cameras with 'E'/'FE' mount series SonyNEX и Sony Alpha you need an adapter M42-Sony E (aka M42-Sony Nex), you can find it at this link. An autofocus adapter is also available for these cameras. Techart PRO Leica M - Sony E Autofocus Adapterwhich can be found at this link.
- OLYMPUS / PANASONIC / KODAK / XIAOMI: For cameras with a bayonet mount Micro 4/3 (Micro 4:3) you need an adapter M42-Micro 4/3, you can find it at this link.
- CANON M: For cameras with Canon EF-M mount need adapter M42-Canon M, it can be found at this link.
- CANON R and RF-S: For cameras with Canon RF mount need adapter M42-Canon R, it can be found at this link.
- Nikon 1: For cameras Nikon 1 Series need adapter M42-Nikon 1, you can find it at this link.
- Nikon Z: For cameras Nikon Z series (FX/DX) need an adapter M42-Nikon Z, it can be found at this link.
- FUJIFILM X: For cameras with mount X need an M42-Fuji X adapter, you can find it at this link.
- FUJIFILM GFX: For medium format cameras G-mount need M42-Fuji GFX adapter, you can find it at this link.
- SAMSUNG: For cameras with NX mount, you need an M42-Samsung NX adapter, you can find it at this link. There are no adapters for the NX mini camera yet.
- PENTAX: For Q-mount cameras, you need an M42-Pentax Q adapter, you can find it at this link.
- SIGMA / PANASONIC / LEICA: For cameras with L mount you need an M42-Leica L adapter, you can find it at this link.
- LEICA: For cameras with a bayonet mount Leica M need adapter M42-L / M, you can find it at this link.
If you have any questions on compatibility and adapters - ask in the comments (comments do not require any registration at all).
Enlightenment of the rear and front lens of the Industar-50-2 lens
Sample photos on Industar 50-2
All photos without processing. Shot on Nikon D90. Only reduced size.
More photos on Nikon D80 и Canon 350D
And examples of photos on full-frame cameras Nikon D700 and Sony a7R:
Here link to the archive with the originalsshot with 36MP Sony a7R camera - 353 MB, 11 .ARW photos (RAW)
Industar-50-2 3,5 / 50
Addition
I recently purchased INDUSTRAR-50-2 3,5 / 50 (the name is written in Cyrillic, serial number # 7457498), which differs very little from Industar-50-2 3,5 / 50 (from this review, serial number # 80126529). The differences are miniature:
- INDUSTR-50-2 3,5 / 50 has vertical green lines to indicate the focusing distance. During focusing, the frame rim extends forward, vertical lines allow you to accurately determine the focusing distance.
- INDUSTRAR-50-2 3,5 / 50 has an older KMZ factory logo with an arrow at the end of a stylized beam.
- different spelling of the name: INDUSTR-50-2 and INDUSTAR-50-2
The differences are clearly shown below:
Personal experience
Modern cameras look very funny with such a small lens, some people even ask what kind of bayonet cap I have. Many photographers do not attach any importance to the capabilities of the Industar-50-2 lens, but with its help you can really get great photos. If you are interested in this lens and you want to purchase it, then contact us using the contacts from the manual optics section.
Industar-50-2 3,5 / 50
UPDATED
Examples of photographs on INDUSTRAR-50-2 3,5 / 50 (like this) and a camera Nikon D700 a photographer shared with readers of Radozhiva Vladimir Tuzlay:
Results
Industar-50-2 3,5 / 50 is very compact and contented cutting half a ruble, which allows you to use it for a number of standard photo tasks. From the big conclusions, this small lens can simply be arrogant :)
Catalog modern brand lenses 'Zenitar' и 'Helios' can look at this link.
Comments on this post do not require registration. Anyone can leave a comment. Many different photographic equipment can be found on AliExpress.
Material prepared Arkady Shapoval. Training/Consultations | Youtube | Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | Telegram
Arkady, in the ability to write articles on your favorite topics you are inimitable;)
An interesting review, great photos. Thanks.
Poraju podruzі buy, for the cob available obktiv
Get competently written articles! Ark, so trimy !!!
Of the 5 photos, 7-10 were awarded (the composition was shot). Yak for XNUMX bucks then the result is better!
Crazy.
Z pov., Vova.Destin
Very surprised by the quality of the picture. I shot them on film, the sharpness was much better than your shots. Maybe just an unsuccessful assembly came across, and so the lens is very sharp.
I also want to say thank you very much for your articles - very interesting and informative :)
ZY Please answer me on the soap about the sale ...
Quote:
“If the lens had the ability to focus at infinity, it would be the most popular Soviet lens for Nikon due to its cheapness and image quality.”
It is not the lens that does not have the ability to focus on infinity, but Nikon. It just has a different working length, and not 45,5, like most Soviet threaded lenses. Therefore, I use Kenon, with which everything is tip-top, and almost any lens at infinity.
The review just implies the loss of infinity on the Nikon system, for more details read Soviet optics in my article.
Canon is a wonderful system, although a number of lenses are suitable for Nikon without any adapters and it is possible to control the aperture, as well as receive confirmation of focus for all lenses, which is difficult and / or impossible to achieve on a Canon system.
"There is a possibility of aperture control, as well as receive focus confirmation for all lenses"
vrahoyuchi, the optics is manual - the function is to navigate the loan)
The article is well written. It's a pity that the small size pictures cannot be viewed closer. Although I have seen enough test shots of this beautiful pancake on Flickr.com, there is even a group with the name of this lens. I recommend. There are stunning pictures. Filters and adapters to it completely do not want to release and sharpen in commercial companies of a turner. You can not try to look for I have been doing this for a long time. It's a pity. He is good and in b & w photography there he shines in all its glory ... Whoever shot them well, will never throw him into the trash can. And if you also constantly photograph in the vastness of Europe, then you will feel the difference when you shoot a superzoom and put on a light pancake. With age, you will feel the difference - your health is not perfect ...
It’s just not profitable for me to buy a hosting service in order to debug full-size photos, here the photos in the 1280x850 gallery are quite enough to understand what kind of beast)
Thank you, if my lens, I would redo it.
How will the use of an adapter with a lens affect the image quality? Thanks.
There will be a picture not so sharp. I still can’t do a test with a lens and without a lens. You are not the first to ask.
I found now the zenith with the industrial, I can’t understand how to unscrew it)) please tell the fool)
It is simply unscrewed from the device (like a nut). He could stick a little in the thread and remove it would be difficult.
On Industar, which I had, the aperture reaches only f8. Is it a marriage?
Maybe a tricky modification, or maybe a marriage. Often the diaphragm does not close to the end (up to 16.0) due to problems with lubrication or the diaphragm blades.
Exactly. It only comes to f8, but on the other hand it rolls over 3,5 (as if there was f2). Most likely a marriage.
Due to the TOTAL ABSENCE of SIDE IMAGES, it works perfectly in the backlight when there is a deep hood (removable for both the I-50 and the I-50-2). Due to its small size, you can do without a hood by covering the lens from bright side light with your hand.
Good day! First of all, thanks for the reviews of Soviet optics. I shoot with Canon. Since I haven't worked on the L-series yet, I have to use Soviet lenses. Your articles prompted me to get old "Zeniths" from the shelves and twist Indus 50-2 and Helios 44m from there. There are no complaints about both. Sharpness on Industar is beyond expectations. The standard Canon EFS 18-55 IS at 50 mm does not "take off" at all. Since it is very easy for my industrialist to turn the focusing ring, with some skill, you can quickly aim even at moving objects. And the build quality is generally just “AH”. My copy, for example, is 50 years old.
I think, in order to deeply understand photography, it is simply necessary to be able to take advantage of Soviet optics.
Tell me what is the difference between the Industar 50-2 3,5 / 50 lens and the Industar 50 3,5 / 50 lens. Thank you in advance for your response.
as far as I know, everything is i-50 from rangefinders, and i-50-2 from SLR cameras.
Old, rangefinder, Industar-50 (I only have "White") fit perfectly on DSLRs ... After twisting the "rangefinder pusher" ...
I had them "regular" on Zenit-3M (SLR) and Zorky-6 (rangefinder) ... the only difference is in the "pusher" ...
I specially checked ...
In steps:
1. Loosen one screw fixing the “extension” ring and twist the ring itself.
2. We twist the "pusher of the rangefinder" (ATTENTION - here the thread is "left", that is, twist "Clockwise").
—
In “my memory” this is the only lens that, with a “light (not always of course) movement of the hand” turns from a rangefinder to a mirror lens and back… with just one hour screwdriver.
—
This applies only to the white and rangefinder version of Industar-50 M39. There were also black ... variations are possible ...
Thanks for the information.
those. It can not be used with a SLR camera?
Thanks to the author, a very interesting and informative article. I am the owner of the industrial 50-2 (m42) and 50 (white m39 + adapter ring m39-m42), on the Nikon forum, a kind person suggested how to make infinity in 15 minutes. Everything is done with a small screwdriver and a file. 100% of the appearance of infinity, I checked it myself. If anyone is interested, here is the link http://bianor.livejournal.com/764.html . Good luck.
White industrial-50 m39 to 60g with the red letter P. according to the drawing is much better than black! Warm colors and colorful colors;)
My Indian, 50-2, 72nd, has a thread diameter of 33 mm.
Make sure that Industar-50-2 KMZ of 1986 (state acceptance and flawless blackening - neither lens chamfers nor aperture blades are visible) with single-layer anti-reflection coating works better than MC Helios-81N and MC Kaleinar-5N: firstly , secondary images are completely absent (the opponents, although they are very pale, but they are) and, secondly, the light scattering is less than that of the MC opponents.
The front cover is clear “6. Due to its small size, it is quite difficult to find the front cover. If not, you can use the hollow (usually white) rear lens cap from Nikon lenses. ”
And what if there is no back? :) what kind of cover to attach to it ...
the rear will fit any lens with a M42 thread (helios)
Today I bought it. :-) already for 400 r. 80 years old. Like New. It looks indecent on the camera :-) :-) :-) :-) I will redo it to infinity. Perhaps I'll play around for a while :-) and then on a monocle. Cutting. Small. Dark. interesting.:-)
Arkady I can take a couple of shots with the industrial I have two of them export and the usual one with and without a lens. add to the topic? By the way, export is somehow more interesting and a little more !!
Put pictures somewhere, I can put links to galleries.
Please explain how, with such a small size, the lens produces such pictures, especially on a full-frame camera.
After all, the same Industar 61 with similar characteristics is much larger. Why, then, make big glasses on other lenses with FR 50?
Very much I-50-2 is knocked out of fifty dollars by its size.
Its aperture is small, and this is a small size.