replies: 1 983

  1. Maria
    27.11.2019

    the basis for comparison is a little not clear
    It would be more logical to compare with fixed political parties.

    Reply

  2. Vladimir, + 380974940245
    27.11.2019

    Senior Citizen I am selling two new Kiev-19 cameras with Helios 81H 2/50 and Zenit E 44/2 with 2/58. They are installed on Nikon and Canon without an adapter. I will buy an adapter for 4 $. I want 800 and 700 UAH for each device.

    Reply

    • Oleksandr
      25.06.2020

      still for sale?

      Reply

  3. К
    03.12.2019

    Arkady and everyone in charge - respect
    Does it make sense to buy this lens if there is a manual Nikon Nikkor 50 1: 1,8? I want more swirling bokeh

    Reply

    • B. R. P.
      04.12.2019

      For swirling bokeh, yes.

      Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      04.12.2019

      Full frame only. If crop, it makes no sense.

      Reply

      • К
        04.12.2019

        Thank you

        Reply

      • pitroLv
        19.02.2020

        Does this apply to Canon?
        81N on the frame (Canon 80D) is useless to use?

        Reply

      • Michael
        19.02.2020

        there is little sense for torsion in bokeh, because the effect is more pronounced at the edges, and the crop will cut out the center of the image

        Reply

      • VitaLiy
        21.11.2021

        Can you have a crush on Gelios 81H? With 52mm thread and Kinv inscription (as in the photo). I will gladly buy or exchange for the same 49mm)))
        Dovgo was looking for, found but not the size of the bottom, did not know what was in two versions, and according to Murphy's law I came across not my size (

        Reply

      • Arkady Shapoval
        22.11.2021

        no) they are quickly lost, I use snaps from Nikon

        Reply

    • kotofei
      29.04.2021

      Twisted bokeh is an optical defect, a consequence of trying to get F2.0 for free, without using a heavy type of glass. Buy for an optical defect? - but why?

      Reply

  4. Jury
    08.02.2020

    The lens is very decent. I had to use it on a Nikon D300 with exposure confirmation. Also, sometimes I shoot for Kiev19 in a bunch of Helios81n. The result is quite decent. I spread an example of a film photo

    Reply

  5. Alexander
    28.02.2020

    Good day. Bought this lens. And on it there is no rim for which the scream was attached, so it is necessary, or is it some kind of defective. Or a different kind of scream than the standard one on Nikon. Tell me plz, Google did not give an answer

    Reply

    • Alexander
      28.02.2020

      room

      Reply

      • Paul
        20.04.2020

        you can see the huge gap between the decorative ring and the lens. and the ring should be close to the lens. maybe the ring was not screwed in because it did not get into the thread. try to screw it to the end, it may not work right the first time. nothing is done there :)

        Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      28.02.2020

      someone grind a filter thread

      Reply

      • Alexander
        28.02.2020

        And why is this done at all? From the badge, I myself did not pay attention to it ...

        Reply

      • Arkady Shapoval
        28.02.2020

        This is not usually done. Why - you need to ask the previous owner

        Reply

      • Alexander
        28.02.2020

        I get it. Thanks. Next time you have to be careful.

        Reply

      • Max Cold
        28.02.2020

        Try to screw the plastic ring with the inscription "Helios-81" deeper, it is attached to the same thread as the filter. It looks like it was not completely screwed in.

        Reply

      • B. R. P.
        28.02.2020

        There is solid metal, not plastic. And nothing is screwed

        Reply

      • Alexander
        02.03.2020

        Screw deeper did not work. It turned out to unscrew the washer on which the name of the lens is written. I screwed the filter in its place, and already on the filter you can put on the cover. Visually, of course, not really, but it does not affect the quality of the photo ;-) Yes, and he got it at a tasty price, so it's a sin to complain)

        Reply

  6. B. R. P.
    28.02.2020

    This is the first time I see this ...

    Reply

  7. Henry
    21.04.2020

    Good afternoon.
    I have a question, and I have been rummaging through various sources for a long time, getting, at times, a contradictory or foggy result.
    My question is whether the Helios-81H 2/50 will fit my Nikon FM2. On the mount, of course, he will get up, but will the exposure metering system work correctly with this lens? Only lenses with the AI ​​specification are suitable on Nikon FM2, and as far as I understand from the materials on your site, Helios has such a specification.
    Thank you very much in advance for your reply!

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      21.04.2020

      There is no definite answer. Not all lenses can mount on FM2. If you do not sit down, you will need to grind off a little ledge of the skirt. Measurement will work correctly. Helios after 1991 under the name Arsat usually land without problems.

      Reply

      • Henry
        01.05.2020

        Thank you very much for the answer! It will not make problems. I was more worried about the possibility of transmitting the value of the set aperture through the AI ​​system. Apparently, my friend, whom I asked, needs to modify the lens, because for some reason this system does not work for him, the camera always believes that the aperture is maximally opened. True, he does not have FM2, but F4. He has no problems with Kaleinar-5N, however.

        Reply

    • Alexey
      21.04.2020

      99 percent that everything will work correctly.
      Maybe someone will be useful, but never put the Helios-81H on a Nikon F4 - the screw hole on the lens mount coincides with the signal pin for recognizing AI-S type lenses on the camera mount.
      And after you install it, it is impossible to remove it without third-party intervention.
      With the rest of the cameras, on which this pin is not, everything is fine.

      Reply

      • BB
        25.05.2020

        But should the pin not be recessed when the lens release button is pressed? (Otherwise, how is AI-S removed?)

        Reply

      • Alexey
        25.05.2020

        in native glasses there is a milled groove.

        Reply

      • BB
        25.05.2020

        In the sense - with a smooth exit to the bayonet plane?

        Reply

      • Alexey
        25.05.2020

        Yeah, on both sides, moreover :)

        Reply

      • Alexey
        25.05.2020

        even on this site there are pictures radojuva.com/2012/06/nikon-ai-s-old-lens-about/

        Reply

      • BB
        25.05.2020

        Thank you, I did not pay attention to this deepening.

        Reply

  8. Max
    28.04.2020

    Everything is fine, but the diaphragm does not work on Nikon D7500 in any way ...

    Reply

    • B. R. P.
      28.04.2020

      In what sense does it not work?

      Reply

    • Max
      28.04.2020

      Soryan. Understood. Everything is working!

      Reply

      • US6IBD
        07.05.2020

        1-2 years ago I bought 81H and went to test it in nature. On an open diaphragm, everything was normal, and on a closed one, there were continuous overexposures. It turned out that the petals were stuck from the oil and fired with a delay. After disassembly and cleaning, there are no complaints.

        Reply

      • B. R. P.
        08.05.2020

        Very familiar situation.

        Reply

  9. Stas
    22.05.2020

    Good afternoon. I could not find another place to address the problem. Today came with Avito Helios MS 81H 2/83. On my Nikon 5200 stood up as a native. The aperture ring, which is closer to the camera, works, but the wide focus ring, if I understand correctly what it is, does not twist at all. It stands at infinity, like a glove. And with his strength and in every way, only everything is backlash. What to do?

    Reply

    • Gregor
      22.05.2020

      Oho-ho ... (((

      Reply

    • Trueash
      22.05.2020

      Hit hard? drowned? It is unlikely that the diaphragm would also have suffered ... Probably, the lubricant has turned to stone from time to time. In general, either send back to the seller with swear words, or find a craftsman who will disassemble and clean it, or arm yourself with good screwdrivers and clean it yourself. There is nothing particularly complicated there, the network is full of instructions on how to do this.

      Reply

      • Stas
        22.05.2020

        Thank. Disassembled. found the reason, but it is strange. He unscrewed the lens mount, took off the diaphragm ring and reached almost to the lens block. The photo shows yellow, I don’t know what to call it on two bolts, the same one below, removed already. So, without them, the focus ring began to spin. Why is it so strange?

        Reply

      • Neustrdm
        22.05.2020

        These are brass guides, they should be there. Bring it back.
        The helicoid of this lens is based on multi-threaded cylinders.
        They should spin in each other freely.
        If they do not spin, it means that the lubricant has petrified or there was a deformation.

        Find the instructions for parsing in the internet, now I don’t remember the details.
        In general, you need to remove the lens block with the diaphragm completely (get to it from the front),
        further, remove the outer rings so that these threaded cylinders remain in the hands.
        Next, you need to put marks on the cylinders in order to unwind them and then twist them back, hitting the marks in the right places of the thread.

        As you unwind, remove the grease, grease a little with silicone grease, collect the helicoid, and everything else. In general, hemorrhage for an evening or two. Good luck.

        Reply

      • Stas
        22.05.2020

        Yeah ... damn it. I don't know if these so-called spring balls which are tiny. Only then I read about them before disassembling them. Essno they are not, maybe lost, maybe they were not there. I then tried to collect it, but it did not work. There is little information on this in the internet ... I can’t put together the mechanism of the diaphragm ... my hands can’t have a lot of space ... Maybe there is where to fix it in the Moscow region?

        Reply

      • Neustrdm
        23.05.2020

        Yes, throw it out.
        Order yourself another. It is not worth the time spent, especially since it is not the MS version and the petals are not blackened.

        Reply

      • Stas
        24.05.2020

        By the way, it is the MS version. Generally sent to Kurgan, there for 100 rubles they will put everything in place.

        Reply

      • B. R. P.
        23.05.2020

        Ask this friend: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J2-wZVRrCUM&list=PL-oF1FiKngAVhtI1RyDcuxrYPGykizQNZ&index=11&t=0s There are video contacts there. It can be repaired by shipment.

        Reply

      • Stas
        24.05.2020

        Thanks. Smotrell already)) to whom he just did not write, even in Moscow time out of 20 offices of "masters" all 20 refused))) As a result, I found in Kurgan, checked, agreed, painted everything, etc. for 1000 r will fix everything. I will keep in touch. I sent everything to him. I understand that now the lens will turn gold, but damn it, he is the first one. let it be special.

        Reply

      • BB
        25.05.2020

        For 1000 rubles you can find a lens in good condition ...

        Reply

    • 1Ds_mk3
      22.05.2020

      It was already written here - Avito has degraded noticeably over the past 2-3 years.
      There are few honest sellers left. You can not buy photo equipment through Avito delivery.
      Exceptions are sellers with more than 10 reviews with 4-5 stars.

      Reply

  10. Stas
    31.05.2020

    Colleagues, good afternoon. finally happened, they repaired the ill-fated lens Helios MS 81N-2/53. I had to send him to a master who agreed to take up work (many refused, because I climbed into it myself and could not collect it) to Kurgan (from Moscow, by the way) for only 1500 rubles. The master completely disassembled it, the lens block, helicoid, aperture blades.
    I remind you that I bought on Avito upon arrival it turned out that the focus ring does not work and the diaphragm sinks.
    The master corrected: the grease stuck like glue to the helicoid, so the ring did not move, grease got on the diaphragm blades, and it worked every other time. The lens has not been used for 30 years. He himself was 1983. now everything is fine, everything works. As a result, its cost increased))) And in fact I “bought” it for 4700 rubles (Avito + repair and all dispatches). But now as good as new!

    Reply

    • BB
      31.05.2020

      Your "golden" Helios came out at least three times more expensive than the normal price. For this money it was possible to buy something much more interesting.

      Reply

      • Stas
        01.06.2020

        Gilded for sure)) But in general, I have never seen cheaper than 2500, Avito, Yula, private ads, I have never seen cheaper. But I got it for 2500, almost a pig in a poke. This is my first experience of communicating with manual equipment. Therefore, this instance is my peer, has become closer and dearer.

        Reply

      • BB
        01.06.2020

        We have the cheapest on OLX (Avito analog) - 400 UAH ($ 15), many offers 650-900 UAH. ($ 24- $ 34, about 1670-2300 rubles), and these are the MC versions.
        His own, "MC Helios-81N 2/50" took for 550 UAH. a couple of years ago (~ $ 20, I will not say the exact course at that time), 1990.

        Reply

    • B. R. P.
      31.05.2020

      The main thing is that the photos are cool. Good luck!

      Reply

      • Stas
        01.06.2020

        Thank you!

        Reply

    • US6IBD
      01.06.2020

      When I bought Helios 81, I noticed overexposures when shooting on the covered. It turned out that the petals of the diaphragm are flooded with oil and are triggered with a large delay. 20 minutes was enough to disassemble the cleaning and assembly. Thank God that was the only problem.

      Reply

  11. Oleg
    12.07.2020

    With Canon 5D, original (reduced size)

    Reply

    • Oleg
      12.07.2020

      With Canon 5D, original (reduced size)

      Reply

  12. ProPhoto
    25.07.2020

    about the “best” topic is controversial…. just put on Nikon without a "tambourine" .. bokeh, to put it mildly, is not the most (black and white photos especially visible) .. there were almost all heliuses .. this is just the middle, a bunch of compromises among all

    Reply

  13. Yar
    02.09.2020

    good afternoon
    I have a version of ms, put an ultraviolet filter on top.
    I tried to make landscapes for him, but there is no sharpness, everything is blown out and soft.
    Is this the norm ??
    Raw image without processing in jpg (processing was disabled on the camera, but processing is the same)

    Reply

    • Trueash
      03.09.2020

      You shot against the light, plus the filter added re-reflections, and the veil appeared. Is there a veil in other pictures?

      Reply

    • B. R. P.
      03.09.2020

      Try not to put the filter on, use a lens hood. Highlights can occur due to the notorious oil on the aperture blades, and the blades themselves are not blackened. Judging by the exiph of your photo, did you shoot in the open? Getting into sharpness at long distances is a rather difficult task, you could miss.

      Reply

      • Trueash
        03.09.2020

        By the way, 81's trouble is not so much the oil as strange metallic sparkles on the lenses - someone says that this enlightenment is peeling off, someone says that it is shavings ... Anyway, this infection considerably reduces the contrast. Mine had this, I gave it to clean it - it became much better

        Reply

      • B. R. P.
        03.09.2020

        On mine so far there is no such thing, but enlightenment can climb (not only on the G-81N) and shavings, judging by the reviews.

        Reply

      • Neustrdm
        26.09.2020

        Sequins - this is enlightenment coming off, especially on arsat.

        Reply

      • Maria
        25.09.2020

        By the way, the hood helped me a lot. Although the “veil” remained open, but during processing it is possible to equalize brightness-contrast almost to normal. Without a lens hood, it was generally impossible to shoot in bright weather. Lens from Kiev.
        I'm afraid to clean myself, my hands are from a known place. Does someone make the video step by step? At 2.8 and beyond, the lens is very cool, it's a pity “under the knife” just for the sake of the open one.
        still, maybe someone knows, the halos are evenly round on light sources, even if you cover the diaphragm - is this also dirt?

        Reply

      • Neustrdm
        26.09.2020

        No, unfortunately, ghosting is the result of poor enlightenment, I tried it on several lenses of different years, even a complete cleaning of the lenses in alcohol did not help. Consider halos as a signature trait, just like twisted bokeh :)

        Reply

      • Maria
        28.09.2020

        Thank you, reassured) In that regard. that you can not try to do something with it. Although if the backlight is not directly behind the subject, but a little diffused, it copes very well with the hood.
        The lens has many advantages, including the predictability of the result, it is convenient to focus on it, with 2.8 it is sharp, I even shoot landscapes with it. Halos are the lesser of evils. You can shoot something more modern)

        Reply

    • Neustrdm
      03.09.2020

      Maybe the diaphragm sticks, doesn't close completely, hence the overexposure by 1-1.5 stops, as you can see.
      Try shooting in a fully open position.
      The filter can add reflections, so it is better against light without it.
      But a hood can protect a little from side light and save a little contrast.

      Reply

  14. Stas
    25.09.2020

    Today I received this lens, began to take pictures, and everything was covered in soap around the edges, I thought to wipe the lenses, and then I noticed that the bayonet does not fit tightly, crawls relative to the camera mount by a fraction of a millimeter, along the entire axis. What now? To put the native Nikon bayonet?

    Reply

  15. Victor
    19.11.2020

    I really like this lens. True, this article says that OH has no backlash, but for some reason I have it! There is also a problem - this is a jumping aperture and I have not found how to get rid of it anywhere on the network. Can anyone help? I have a Nikon D7000, and I threw digital lenses into the dustbin of history long ago. Besides this, I also have Helios 40-2. I shoot photos and videos on them and the picture, as they say now, turns out to be cinematic! I would also like to purchase something similar for the kit somewhere around 30 mm focal length. Can someone advise? Thanks!

    Reply

  16. Nicholas
    23.12.2020

    a question from a teapot) tell me about the situation I'm waiting for the carcass of nikon 90f: 1_ helios 81 (and with it the world 24n) n will stand without damaging this carcass, what functions will work?

    Reply

    • Ivan
      23.12.2020

      90F? Maybe D90?

      Reply

  17. R'RёS,R ° F "RёR№
    02.01.2021

    Good day to everyone! Tell me please, the discussed lens Helios-81H will not damage the Nikon D610 camera if you put it on it?

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      02.01.2021

      If he sits on it without any problems (like a native), it won't hurt.

      Reply

  18. spitzer
    04.01.2021

    were there versions with m42? without pilling

    Reply

  19. Pasha
    04.01.2021

    For a long time I have been looking at this Helios, more precisely, at Arsat, and I think - was it worth it to buy it for Nikon FM2 film and will metering work?

    Reply

    • Igor K
      09.01.2021

      This Helios works excellently on Nikon FM2, because the exposure metering works there in manual mode.
      More precisely, the exposure is manually exposed.

      Reply

    • B. R. P.
      16.02.2021

      Will work with any lens. which you can install on it. Even without a lens)

      Reply

  20. Igor K
    09.01.2021

    There are two Helios-81N available. One with the number 9113077 greenish coating and thread for a filter (hood) = 52mm. The second is 8707729 with violet coating, but the thread for the filter (hood) is much smaller there, perhaps 49mm. And it's smaller in size than the first.
    Whether they differ optically or in drawings, I don't know, I haven't checked. But I only use one, which is newer with the number 9113077. Just because I have a 52mm Nikon front cover on it. The regular one with the Kiev logo does not hold up well. :)

    Reply

    • B. R. P.
      16.02.2021

      Yes, there is 49mm.

      Reply

  21. Julia
    19.01.2021

    Hello, I want to start photographing, I have a Nikon l830, but I don’t like the quality of portrait photos on it. What do you think, if you buy the Helios H81 lens for it, it will get better? Or is it better to take a new camera, I liked Nikon d5100 and d3200, and buy this lens for it?

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      19.01.2021

      For a beginner with a DSLR, manual lenses are not recommended, it is better to add money and take the native autofocus Nikon 5100 / 3200G to any d50 or d1.8

      Reply

    • B. R. P.
      16.02.2021

      Nikon l830 is a camera with a non-interchangeable lens) You cannot install any lens on it, except perhaps some kind of attachment for the trunk. So follow Arkady's advice.

      Reply

  22. Maksim
    05.02.2021

    I put a dandelion on the lens, programmed the aperture values ​​2-16. And on the D90 I started playing with this whole thing. I noticed that in aperture priority at values ​​different from F2, the histogram shifts more and more towards overexposure, the smaller the hole, the brighter. It turned out that the hole on F16 does not close completely.

    Reply

    • Maksim
      05.02.2021

      No camera.

      Reply

      • Maksim
        05.02.2021

        Tried programming different minimum aperture values. For example: it completely closes at the values ​​of F32, but everything is exactly the same at F16, the opening is the same, respectively, the exposure is not correct.When programming the minimum value at F8, in fact, nothing does not change, just with all programming options, the values ​​are exactly the same wrong holes.
        I compared the blinker levers on this lens with the 50mm 1,8D. They are different in thickness, maybe that's why the carcass doesn't push the aperture, but on other lenses from Nikon the levers are the same as Helios .. So you don't need to cut)

        Reply

      • Maksim
        05.02.2021

        And now the question is: Is everyone the same? And if so, then maybe someone solved the problem how to fix it?

        Reply

      • cvlad
        22.03.2021

        Likewise. Here is what is written on Lushnikov's website: “… Remark. On pre-AIS lenses manufactured before 1981, the aperture control mechanism is non-linear. When shooting with such lenses, a slight exposure compensation may be required ... ”

        Reply

  23. Eugene
    15.02.2021

    Hello, please tell me. I have a D3200, today I took Helios-81H. On the removed lens, the diaphragm closes, and on the installed lens, it is always open. How do you make the aperture controllable on the attached lens?

    Reply

    • B. R. P.
      15.02.2021

      The aperture should close to the set value when the shutter is released. If this does not happen, then there is a malfunction, excess lubrication, the spring has weakened, it happens that the pusher of the diaphragm drive in the camera does not reach the lens jumper.

      Reply

    • Maksim
      24.02.2021

      I have on D90 without Lushnikov's dandelion (chip), the same was always open even in the “M” mode. I put a dandelion and everything is fine)

      Reply

      • Maksim
        25.02.2021

        Although, maybe I'm confusing .. I forgot already) logically, it should, indeed, close to the set values ​​when the shutter is triggered, I really forgot something ...)

        Reply

  24. Novel
    18.04.2021

    Good afternoon to the author and all guests, does it make sense to compare for the purchase of Helios 81H with fifty dollars 7artisans 55mm 1.4, TTartisan 50 1.2 and kamlan 50mm 1.1, taking into account the need to buy an adapter for sony nex for helios, the cost is close to the used Chinese ones, if not what of the Chinese is still suitable for a beginner for portraits, or is there a fundamental difference not to notice a newcomer?

    Reply

  25. Novel
    18.04.2021

    Good afternoon to the author and all guests, does it make sense to compare for the purchase of Helios 81H with fifty dollars 7artisans 55mm 1.4, TTartisan 50 1.2 and kamlan 50mm 1.1, taking into account the need to buy an adapter for sony nex for helios, the cost is close to the used Chinese ones, if not what of the Chinese is still suitable for a beginner for portraits, or is there a fundamental difference not to be noticed by a beginner?

    Reply

    • Victor
      18.04.2021

      You know, I had a Helios (44th, though) with an adapter just on a nex, now here is ttartisan 50 / 1.2, and so, after the Chinese I don't plan to install Helios anymore. Here is the weight distribution (important!) With the dimensions and the absence of possible backlash, and the image (the Chinese are afraid of contradictions less and at f / 2 it is obviously better than gelik)

      Reply

    • Victor
      18.04.2021

      It makes sense to install Gelik if it already exists (I had it) through an inexpensive adapter, in order to understand, in principle, how it is at all and whether it is worth it.

      Reply

      • Novel
        18.04.2021

        I also have 44m4, for helios I compared it quite sharply with 44m6 with 44-2, with a minolt md 50 1.7, in the end I left it and sold the rest so I thought whether 81N would be better or just take a Chinese

        Reply

      • Victor
        18.04.2021

        If there are no thoughts of leaving the nex to another system, I would immediately take the Chinese of course.

        Reply

      • Gregor_S
        18.04.2021

        And I would leave Minolta.
        Like her picture

        Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      18.04.2021

      Definitely Chinese

      Reply

      • Novel
        18.04.2021

        Thank you Arkady, then which of the three options?

        Reply

      • Arkady Shapoval
        18.04.2021

        I have not used Camlanoc. And so, in general terms - TTArtisans 50 / 1.2 (nevertheless, real 1.2 will warm the soul).

        Reply

  26. Load more comments ...

Reply

 

 

Top
mobility. computer